• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.

作者信息

Hansen D, Jensen J S

机构信息

University of Copenhagen, Department of Orthopedics U-2162, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Feb;63(1):13-8. doi: 10.3109/17453679209154841.

DOI:10.3109/17453679209154841
PMID:1738962
Abstract

Contemporary mixing methods--centrifugation, vacuum mixing with or without precompression--were compared with manual mixing by testing strength characteristics in accordance with a proposed revision of the international standard for bone cements as applied to 10 cement brands. Simplex brands and low-viscosity cements were the strongest, and were not improved by any of the vacuum-mixing procedures. Centrifuging was found unsuitable for low-viscosity cements. Without attaining the strength of the former, the cements best suited for auxiliary mixing methods were CMW-1 and Palacos brands, which improved 6-11 percent by either of the methods. The Sterivac system was generally found unacceptable, because about 20 percent of a cement package was retained in the mixing gear, and the application of precompression had no additional effect on compressive and bending strengths.

摘要

相似文献

1
Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Feb;63(1):13-8. doi: 10.3109/17453679209154841.
2
Additional mechanical tests of bone cements.骨水泥的额外力学测试。
Acta Orthop Belg. 1992;58(3):268-71.
3
Mechanical versus manual mixing of bone cement.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Aug;59(4):400-2. doi: 10.3109/17453678809149390.
4
Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation.抗生素浸渍对 Simplex P 和 Palacos R 丙烯酸骨水泥疲劳寿命的影响,有无离心处理。
J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Apr;23(4):379-97. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820230402.
5
The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.丙烯酸骨水泥的表观断裂韧性:三个变量的影响。
Biomaterials. 1998 May;19(10):961-7. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00193-2.
6
Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.制备技术对丙烯酸骨水泥孔隙率的影响。
Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Aug;59(4):403-9. doi: 10.3109/17453678809149391.
7
Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties.温度和真空混合对骨水泥性能的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jan(334):326-34.
8
Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.真空混合是否能改善高粘度聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥的疲劳性能?两种不同抽真空方法的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115(3-4):131-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00434539.
9
The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.真空混合骨水泥的临床意义。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan(382):258-66. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00034.
10
Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.三种用于降低Simplex P水泥孔隙率的真空搅拌系统的优化与比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May(254):261-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Stent-Screw Assisted Internal Fixation of Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis on SAIF Technique.支架-螺钉辅助内固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:SAIF技术的比较有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 25;7:291. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
2
Mixing method affects elution and strength of high-dose ALBC: a pilot study.混合方法会影响高剂量 ALBC 的洗脱和强度:一项初步研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2677-83. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2351-2.
3
How do porosity-inducing techniques affect antibiotic elution from bone cement? An in vitro comparison between hydrogen peroxide and a mechanical mixer.
致孔技术如何影响骨水泥中抗生素的洗脱?过氧化氢和机械搅拌器的体外比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2008 Mar;9(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0099-y. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
4
Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.抛光柄与七种市售丙烯酸骨水泥之间的静态剪切强度。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Feb;19(2):591-9. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3211-6. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
5
Influence of two changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on its handling, thermal, physical, and mechanical properties.丙烯酸骨水泥成分的两种变化对其操作、热学、物理和力学性能的影响。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Aug;18(8):1649-58. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3042-5. Epub 2007 May 5.
6
Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.真空混合是否能改善高粘度聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥的疲劳性能?两种不同抽真空方法的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115(3-4):131-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00434539.