Conzen M, Ebel H, Swart E, Skreczek W, Dette M, Oppel F
Gilead Hospitals, Neurochirurgische Klinik, Bielefeld, West Germany.
Brain Inj. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(1):45-52. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008121.
The quality of outcome after severe closed head injury has become of increasing concern to neurosurgeons. The assessment of residual deficits in patients who have recovered from closed head injury can be very difficult. Many patients are classified as having a good recovery according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), but this may be insufficiently focused or sensitive to demonstrate mental deficits objectively. We investigated 33 patients with severe closed head injury who subsequently were diagnosed as having made a good recovery according to the GOS. The severity of the injury was determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and by the presence of a midline shift in the preoperative CT scans. There was a minimal interval of 15 months (means = 1080.5 days, SD = 491 days) between injury and time of neuropsychological testing. Their performance was compared with that of 15 orthopaedic cases. Residual neuropsychological deficits can be demonstrated on the majority of measures in a group of patients who have achieved good recovery on the GOS. Midline shift in preoperative CT scans is not of prognostic value for long-lasting neuropsychological deficits.
严重闭合性颅脑损伤后的预后质量已日益引起神经外科医生的关注。评估从闭合性颅脑损伤中恢复的患者的残余缺陷可能非常困难。许多患者根据格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)被归类为恢复良好,但这可能不够有针对性或不够敏感,无法客观地显示精神缺陷。我们调查了33例严重闭合性颅脑损伤患者,这些患者随后根据GOS被诊断为恢复良好。损伤的严重程度由格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和术前CT扫描中是否存在中线移位来确定。受伤与神经心理学测试时间之间的最短间隔为15个月(平均=1080.5天,标准差=491天)。将他们的表现与15例骨科病例的表现进行了比较。在一组根据GOS恢复良好的患者中,大多数测量指标都能显示出残余的神经心理学缺陷。术前CT扫描中的中线移位对长期神经心理学缺陷没有预后价值。