Gautschi Oliver P, Huser Mélanie C, Smoll Nicolas R, Maedler Sven, Bednarz Stephan, von Hessling Alexander, Lussmann Roger, Hildebrandt Gerhard, Seule Martin A
Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital, St.Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery and Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;115(12):2482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major cause of death and disability worldwide. The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors for neurological and neuropsychological long-term outcome in patients with severe TBI treated according to an intracranial pressure (ICP-) targeted therapy.
From 08/2005 to 12/2008, 46 patients with severe TBI and more than 12h of intensive care treatment were included in this study. Neurological outcome was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Neuropsychological performance assessing 9 different domains was evaluated at long-term follow-up (median 20.5 months; range 10-46). Logistic regression was used to identify favourable outcomes according to the GOS and Fisher's exact tests were used to identify predictors of severe neuropsychological impairments at follow-up.
Twenty-nine patients were available for neuropsychological assessment at long-term follow-up. Only 2 out of 29 patients presented normal or average neuropsychological findings throughout all 9 neuropsychological domains at long-term follow-up. The percentage of a favourable outcome (GOS 4-5) increased from 13.8% at hospital discharge to 75.8% at rehabilitation discharge to 79.3% at long-term follow-up, respectively. Age ≤40 was found to be a strong predictor of favourable outcome at follow-up (OR 5.95, 95% CI 1.41 25.00, p=0.015). The GOS at hospital discharge was not a predictor for severe impairments in any of the 9 different neuropsychological domains (all p-values were p>0.268). In contrast, the GOS at rehabilitation discharge was found to be a predictor of severe impairments at follow-up in all but one domain assessed (all p-values less than p<0.038).
The GOS at rehabilitation discharge should be regarded as a better predictor for neuropsychological impairments at long-term follow-up than the GOS at hospital discharge. Even in patients with favourable GOS after finishing a course of rehabilitation, three quarters of these patients may have at least one severe neuropsychological deficit. Therefore, it remains of paramount importance to provide long-term neuropsychological support to further improve outcome after TBI.
重型颅脑损伤(TBI)仍是全球范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。本研究的目的是评估接受颅内压(ICP)靶向治疗的重型TBI患者神经和神经心理长期预后的预测因素。
2005年8月至2008年12月,本研究纳入了46例重型TBI且接受超过12小时重症监护治疗的患者。用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估神经预后。在长期随访(中位时间20.5个月;范围10 - 46个月)时评估9个不同领域的神经心理表现。采用逻辑回归根据GOS确定良好预后,采用Fisher精确检验确定随访时严重神经心理损伤的预测因素。
29例患者可进行长期随访的神经心理评估。在长期随访中,29例患者中只有2例在所有9个神经心理领域的神经心理检查结果正常或处于平均水平。良好预后(GOS 4 - 5)的比例分别从出院时的13.8%增加到康复出院时的75.8%,再到长期随访时的79.3%。发现年龄≤40岁是随访时良好预后的有力预测因素(OR 5.95,95% CI 1.41 - 25.00,p = 0.015)。出院时的GOS不是9个不同神经心理领域中任何一个领域严重损伤的预测因素(所有p值均p>0.268)。相比之下,发现康复出院时的GOS是除一个评估领域外所有其他领域随访时严重损伤的预测因素(所有p值均小于p<0.038)。
康复出院时的GOS应被视为比出院时的GOS更能预测长期随访时神经心理损伤的指标。即使在完成一个康复疗程后GOS良好的患者中,这些患者中有四分之三可能至少有一项严重的神经心理缺陷。因此,提供长期神经心理支持以进一步改善TBI后的预后仍然至关重要。