Ziessman Harvey A, Bonta Dacian V, Goetze Sibyll, Ravich William J
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21278, USA.
J Nucl Med. 2007 Apr;48(4):568-72. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.036616.
Gastric-emptying studies have no accepted standard methodology or reference values. A simplified standardized protocol with a large reference database has been proposed, with imaging obtained at only 0, 1, 2, and 4 h. The rationale for its 4-h length is data suggesting that delayed emptying is detected with higher sensitivity at 4 h than at 2 h. The purpose of the current investigation was to review our 2-y experience using this protocol, to determine the added value of 4-h imaging, and to determine whether the lag phase can predict delayed emptying.
After ingesting a sandwich made with (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid egg substitute, 175 patients were imaged immediately, every 10 min for 1 h, and then at 2, 3, and 4 h. Percentage retention was calculated for each interval. Sensitivities, specificities, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed for the 1-, 2-, and 3-h intervals on the basis of normal 4-h values. Data were analyzed to determine the added value of the 4-h study. Thresholds were sought that optimized accuracy. ROC analysis was used to determine the predictive value of the lag phase.
Gastric emptying was delayed in 20% of patients at 2 h and in 26% at 4 h, a 29% increase in abnormal studies (P < 0.02). Of those normal at 2 h, 13% became abnormal at 4 h. Of those with delayed emptying at 2 h, 24% normalized at 4 h. Compared with the study at 4 h, the study at 2 h had a 59% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 76% PPV, and 87% NPV. ROC analysis showed that the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.75, 0.93, and 0.97 at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. The threshold for optimal accuracy for 3-h data was estimated to be greater than 30% retention. The accuracy of this threshold was 91%. The lag phase AUC for predicting delayed emptying at 4 h was 0.60.
This first investigation of a large referral patient population using a standardized protocol found that abnormal emptying is detected with greater sensitivity at 4 h than at 2 h and that the lag phase is not predictive of delayed emptying.
胃排空研究尚无公认的标准方法或参考值。有人提出了一种简化的标准化方案及大型参考数据库,成像仅在0、1、2和4小时进行。其4小时时长的依据是数据表明,4小时检测延迟排空的敏感性高于2小时。本研究的目的是回顾我们使用该方案的2年经验,确定4小时成像的附加价值,并确定延迟期是否可预测延迟排空。
摄入用(99m)锝-硫胶体鸡蛋替代品制成的三明治后,对175例患者立即进行成像,每10分钟成像1小时,然后在2、3和4小时成像。计算每个时间段的保留百分比。根据4小时的正常数值,计算1、2和3小时时间段的敏感性、特异性、预测值和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。分析数据以确定4小时研究的附加价值。寻找优化准确性的阈值。采用ROC分析确定延迟期的预测价值。
2小时时20%的患者胃排空延迟,4小时时为26%,异常研究增加29%(P<0.02)。2小时时正常的患者中,13%在4小时时变为异常。2小时时排空延迟的患者中,24%在4小时时恢复正常。与4小时的研究相比,2小时的研究敏感性为59%,特异性为94%,阳性预测值为76%,阴性预测值为87%。ROC分析显示,1、2和3小时的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.75、0.93和0.97。3小时数据的最佳准确性阈值估计大于保留30%。该阈值的准确性为91%。预测4小时延迟排空的延迟期AUC为0.60。
这项首次对大量转诊患者群体使用标准化方案的研究发现,4小时检测异常排空的敏感性高于2小时,且延迟期不能预测延迟排空。