Pelletier-Galarneau Matthieu, Sogbein Oyebola O, Pham Xuan, Hao Jason, Le Jenna, Strober Mark D, Middleton Michael L, Kikut Janusz, Freeman Leonard M, Zuckier Lionel S
The Ottawa Hospital, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jun;56(6):873-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155366. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
Gastric emptying scintigraphy is considered to be the gold standard for detection of gastroparesis and other disorders of gastric motility; Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging guidelines are predicated on imaging over a period of 4 h, which is inconvenient for patients. Bonta et al. introduced 2-h criteria, which served to shorten the protocol in most patients, with negligible loss of accuracy. We have evaluated the Bonta criteria in a larger multicenter trial encompassing 4 academic institutions.
Retrospective data from 4 academic medical centers were aggregated; 431 patients were included, 105 (24.4%) of whom demonstrated delayed gastric emptying defined by 4-h gastric retention of more than 10%. Bonta criteria (retention > 65% is considered abnormal and < 45% normal; otherwise, proceed to complete examination) were applied to the 2-h data. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and resource use for the Bonta method were calculated. Results based on standard 4-h solid gastric emptying, performed according to current Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging guidelines, served as the gold standard.
Retention of 10% or less was achieved by 6, 77, 215, and 326 patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h, respectively. At 2 h, 261 of 431 patients (60.6%) had gastric retention of less than 45%, which according to Bonta would be classified as normal; 62 (14.4%) had gastric retention of more than 65%, which would be classified as delayed emptying; and 108 (25.1%) had intermediate values requiring further imaging through 4 h. The Bonta criteria yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.4%, 96.9%, and 95.8%, respectively, superior to any single cutoff point applied to the 2-h values. The criteria resulted in false-negative results in 8 (1.9%) patients, 6 of whom were borderline-positive at 4 h (gastric retention of 11%-14%). Using the Bonta criteria, 74.9% of studies would be terminated by 2 h, decreasing total camera use by 15.7%, from 1,768 to 1,490 images, and the average study duration would be reduced by 20.6%, from 3.1 to 2.5 h.
In a multicenter cohort, use of the Bonta criteria shortened the duration of studies in most patients, resulting in an effective compromise between reduced resource use, improved patient convenience, and preserved accuracy.
胃排空闪烁扫描被认为是检测胃轻瘫和其他胃动力障碍的金标准;核医学与分子影像学会的指南基于4小时的成像,这对患者来说不方便。邦塔等人引入了2小时标准,该标准在大多数患者中缩短了检查流程,准确性损失可忽略不计。我们在一项涵盖4个学术机构的更大规模多中心试验中评估了邦塔标准。
汇总来自4个学术医疗中心的回顾性数据;纳入431例患者,其中105例(24.4%)表现为胃排空延迟,定义为4小时胃潴留超过10%。将邦塔标准(潴留>65%被认为异常,<45%为正常;否则,进行完整检查)应用于2小时的数据。计算邦塔方法的敏感性、特异性、准确性和资源使用情况。根据核医学与分子影像学会当前指南进行的标准4小时固体胃排空结果作为金标准。
在1、2、3和4小时时,分别有6、77、215和326例患者的潴留率达到10%或更低。在2小时时,431例患者中有261例(60.6%)胃潴留率低于45%,根据邦塔标准将被分类为正常;62例(14.4%)胃潴留率超过65%,将被分类为空排延迟;108例(25.1%)为中间值,需要进行4小时的进一步成像。邦塔标准的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为92.4%、96.9%和95.8%,优于应用于2小时值的任何单个临界值。该标准在8例(1.9%)患者中产生了假阴性结果。其中6例在4小时时为临界阳性(胃潴留率为11%-14%)。使用邦塔标准,74.9%的检查将在2小时内结束,总相机使用量减少15.7%,从1768张图像降至1490张图像,平均检查时长将减少20.6%,从3.1小时降至2.5小时。
在一个多中心队列中,使用邦塔标准缩短了大多数患者的检查时长,在减少资源使用、提高患者便利性和保持准确性之间实现了有效平衡。