Uchihara Toshiki
Department of Neuropathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Neuroscience, 2-6 Musashi-dai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8526, Japan.
Acta Neuropathol. 2007 May;113(5):483-99. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0200-2. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
Silver-staining methods are helpful for histological identification of pathological deposits. In spite of some ambiguities regarding their mechanism and interpretation, they are widely used for histopathological diagnosis. In this review, four major silver-staining methods, modified Bielschowsky, Bodian, Gallyas (GAL) and Campbell-Switzer (CS) methods, are outlined with respect to their principles, basic protocols and interpretations, thereby providing neuropathologists, technicians and neuroscientists with a common basis for comparing findings and identifying the issues that still need to be clarified. Some consider "argyrophilia" to be a homogeneous phenomenon irrespective of the lesion and the method. Thus, they seek to explain the differences among the methods by pointing to their different sensitivities in detecting lesions (quantitative difference). Comparative studies, however, have demonstrated that argyrophilia is heterogeneous and dependent not only on the method but also on the lesion (qualitative difference). Each staining method has its own lesion-dependent specificity and, within this specificity, its own sensitivity. This "method- and lesion-dependent" nature of argyrophilia enables operational sorting of disease-specific lesions based on their silver-staining profiles, which may potentially represent some disease-specific aspects. Furthermore, comparisons between immunohistochemical and biochemical data have revealed an empirical correlation between GAL+/CS-deposits and 4-repeat (4R) tau (corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy and argyrophilic grains) and its complementary reversal between GAL-/CS+deposits and 3-repeat (3R) tau (Pick bodies). Deposits containing both 3R and 4R tau (neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer type) are GAL+/CS+. Although no molecular explanations, other than these empiric correlations, are currently available, these distinctive features, especially when combined with immunohistochemistry, are useful because silver-staining methods and immunoreactions are complementary to each other.
银染方法有助于对病理性沉积物进行组织学鉴定。尽管其机制和解读存在一些不明确之处,但它们仍被广泛用于组织病理学诊断。在本综述中,概述了四种主要的银染方法,即改良 Bielschowsky 法、Bodian 法、Gallyas(GAL)法和 Campbell-Switzer(CS)法,涉及它们的原理、基本方案和解读,从而为神经病理学家、技术人员和神经科学家提供一个共同基础,以便比较研究结果并确定仍需阐明的问题。一些人认为“嗜银性”是一种同质现象,与病变和方法无关。因此,他们试图通过指出不同方法在检测病变方面的不同敏感性(定量差异)来解释方法之间的差异。然而,比较研究表明,嗜银性是异质的,不仅取决于方法,还取决于病变(定性差异)。每种染色方法都有其自身依赖于病变的特异性,并且在这种特异性范围内有其自身的敏感性。嗜银性的这种“依赖于方法和病变”的性质使得能够根据疾病特异性病变的银染图谱对其进行操作性分类,这可能潜在地代表了一些疾病特异性方面。此外,免疫组化和生化数据之间的比较揭示了 GAL+/CS 沉积物与 4 重复(4R)tau(皮质基底节变性、进行性核上性麻痹和嗜银颗粒)之间的经验性相关性,以及 GAL-/CS+沉积物与 3 重复(3R)tau(Pick 小体)之间的互补性反转。同时含有 3R 和 4R tau 的沉积物(阿尔茨海默病类型的神经原纤维缠结)是 GAL+/CS+。尽管目前除了这些经验性相关性之外没有分子解释,但这些独特特征,特别是与免疫组化结合时,是有用的,因为银染方法和免疫反应相互补充。