Suppr超能文献

大剂量奥美拉唑持续输注治疗高危消化性溃疡出血患者比标准剂量奥美拉唑更有效:一项回顾性研究。

Continuous infusion of high-dose omeprazole is more effective than standard-dose omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Simon-Rudler M, Massard J, Bernard-Chabert B, DI Martino V, Ratziu V, Poynard T, Thabut D

机构信息

Service d'Hépatologie et de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr 15;25(8):949-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03286.x.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

High-dose omeprazole reduces the rate of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. However, the effectiveness of high-dose vs. standard-dose omeprazole in peptic ulcer bleeding has never been shown.

AIM

To compare the benefits of high-dose vs. standard-dose omeprazole in peptic ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical files of patients admitted between 1997 and 2004 for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding who had undergone successful endoscopic treatment. We distinguished 2 periods: before 2001, standard-dose omeprazole (40 mg/day intravenously until alimentation was possible, then 40 mg/day orally for 1 week); after 2001, high-dose omeprazole (80 mg bolus injection, then 8 mg/h continuous infusion for 72 h, then 40 mg/day orally for 1 week). During both periods, patients subsequently received omeprazole, 20 mg/day, orally for 3 weeks.

RESULTS

We enrolled 114 patients (period 1, n = 45, period 2, n = 69). Therapy with high-dose omeprazole significantly decreased the occurrence of poor outcome (27 vs. 12%, P = 0.04), rebleeding (24 vs. 7%, P = 0.01), mortality due to haemorrhagic shock (11 vs. 0%, P < 0.001) and need for surgery (9 vs. 1%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, high-dose omeprazole reduced the occurrence of rebleeding, need for surgery and mortality due to hemorrhagic shock in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding, as compared with standard-dose omeprazole.

摘要

未标注

大剂量奥美拉唑可降低消化性溃疡出血内镜治疗后的再出血率。然而,大剂量与标准剂量奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血的有效性尚未得到证实。

目的

比较大剂量与标准剂量奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血的疗效。

方法

我们回顾了1997年至2004年间因高危消化性溃疡出血入院且内镜治疗成功的患者的病历。我们区分了两个时期:2001年前,标准剂量奥美拉唑(静脉注射40毫克/天,直至能够进食,然后口服40毫克/天,持续1周);2001年后,大剂量奥美拉唑(80毫克静脉推注,然后8毫克/小时持续输注72小时,然后口服40毫克/天,持续1周)。在两个时期,患者随后均口服奥美拉唑20毫克/天,持续3周。

结果

我们纳入了114例患者(第1期,n = 45;第2期,n = 69)。大剂量奥美拉唑治疗显著降低了不良结局的发生率(27%对12%,P = 0.04)、再出血率(24%对7%,P = 0.01)、失血性休克死亡率(11%对0%,P < 0.001)以及手术需求(9%对1%,P = 0.05)。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,与标准剂量奥美拉唑相比,大剂量奥美拉唑降低了高危消化性溃疡出血患者的再出血率、手术需求以及失血性休克死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验