Comas George M, Imren Yildirim, Williams Mathew R
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Spring;19(1):16-24. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.01.009.
Recent years have seen many developments in the field of alternative energy sources for arrhythmia surgery. The impetus behind these advances is to replace the traditional, "cut-and-sew" Cox maze III procedure with lesion sets that are simpler, shorter, and safer but just as effective. There is demand for technology to make continuous, linear, transmural ablations reliably with a versatile energy source via an epicardial approach. This would make minimally invasive endoscopic surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) without cardiopulmonary bypass and with a closed chest feasible. These advances would shorten cardio-pulmonary bypass and improve outcomes in patients having surgical ablation and concomitant cardiac surgery. This review summarizes the technology behind alternative energy sources used to treat AF. Alternative energy sources include hypothermic sources (cryoablation) and hyperthermic sources (radiofrequency, microwave, laser, ultrasound). For each source, the biophysical background, mode of tissue injury, factors affecting lesion size, and advantages and complications are discussed.
近年来,心律失常手术的替代能源领域有了许多进展。这些进展背后的推动力是用更简单、更短、更安全但同样有效的病灶集取代传统的“切割缝合”Cox迷宫III手术。人们需要通过心外膜途径,利用通用能源可靠地进行连续、线性、透壁消融的技术。这将使在不进行体外循环和闭合胸腔的情况下,通过微创内镜手术消融心房颤动(AF)成为可能。这些进展将缩短体外循环时间,并改善接受手术消融和同期心脏手术患者的预后。本综述总结了用于治疗AF的替代能源背后的技术。替代能源包括低温源(冷冻消融)和高温源(射频、微波、激光、超声)。针对每种能源,讨论了其生物物理背景、组织损伤模式、影响病灶大小的因素以及优缺点和并发症。