Wang Dian-Shi, Buckinx Roeland, Lecorronc Hervé, Mangin Jean-Marie, Rigo Jean-Michel, Legendre Pascal
UMR CNRS 7102 Neurobiologie des Processus Adaptatifs, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 9 Quai St. Bernard, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, France, and Center for Neuroscience Research, Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC 20010, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Jun 1;282(22):16016-35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701502200. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
Contrary to its effect on the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and C receptors, picrotoxin antagonism of the alpha1 homomeric glycine receptors (GlyRs) has been shown to be non-use-dependent and nonselective between the picrotoxin components picrotoxinin and picrotin. Picrotoxin antagonism of the embryonic alpha2 homomeric GlyR is known to be use-dependent and reflects a channel-blocking mechanism, but the selectivity of picrotoxin antagonism of the embryonic alpha2 homomeric GlyRs between picrotoxinin and picrotin is unknown. Hence, we used the patch clamp recording technique in the outside-out configuration to investigate, at the single channel level, the mechanism of picrotin- and picrotoxinin-induced inhibition of currents, which were evoked by the activation of alpha2 homomeric GlyRs stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells. Although both picrotoxinin and picrotin inhibited glycine-evoked outside-out currents, picrotin had a 30 times higher IC50 than picrotoxinin. Picrotin-evoked inhibition displayed voltage dependence, whereas picrotoxinin did not. Picrotoxinin and picrotin decreased the mean open time of the channel in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating that these picrotoxin components can bind to the receptor in its open state. When picrotin and glycine were co-applied, a large rebound current was observed at the end of the application. This rebound current was considerably smaller when picrotoxinin and glycine were co-applied. Both picrotin and picrotoxinin were unable to bind to the unbound conformation of the receptor, but both could be trapped at their binding site when the channel closed during glycine dissociation. Our data indicate that picrotoxinin and picrotin are not equivalent in blocking alpha2 homomeric GlyR.
与它对A型和C型γ-氨基丁酸受体的作用相反,印防己毒素对α1同聚甘氨酸受体(GlyRs)的拮抗作用已被证明是非使用依赖性的,并且在印防己毒素成分印防己毒素宁和印防己毒素之间没有选择性。已知印防己毒素对胚胎α2同聚甘氨酸受体的拮抗作用是使用依赖性的,反映了一种通道阻断机制,但印防己毒素对胚胎α2同聚甘氨酸受体在印防己毒素宁和印防己毒素之间的拮抗选择性尚不清楚。因此,我们采用外向膜片钳记录技术,在单通道水平上研究印防己毒素和印防己毒素宁诱导电流抑制的机制,这些电流是由稳定转染到中国仓鼠卵巢细胞中的α2同聚甘氨酸受体激活所诱发的。尽管印防己毒素宁和印防己毒素都抑制了甘氨酸诱发的外向膜电流,但印防己毒素的半数抑制浓度(IC50)比印防己毒素宁高30倍。印防己毒素诱发的抑制表现出电压依赖性,而印防己毒素宁则没有。印防己毒素宁和印防己毒素以浓度依赖性方式降低通道的平均开放时间,表明这些印防己毒素成分可以在通道开放状态下与受体结合。当印防己毒素和甘氨酸共同施加时,在施加结束时观察到一个大的反弹电流。当印防己毒素宁和甘氨酸共同施加时,这个反弹电流要小得多。印防己毒素和印防己毒素宁都不能与受体的未结合构象结合,但当通道在甘氨酸解离过程中关闭时,两者都可以被困在它们的结合位点上。我们的数据表明,印防己毒素宁和印防己毒素在阻断α2同聚甘氨酸受体方面并不等效。