Buehler J W, Berkelman R L, Stehr-Green J K
Division of HIV/AIDS, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1992;5(3):257-64.
AIDS surveillance data are widely used in setting HIV intervention policies, and the effectiveness of these data depend on their completeness. We reviewed studies conducted by state and local health departments on the completeness of AIDS reporting. These studies identified AIDS cases through alternate data sources, such as death certificates, hospital discharge records, disease registries, or medication records. In most instances greater than 80% of AIDS cases detected through these studies had been reported, although lower levels of reporting were found in some outpatient settings. A comparison of vital records and AIDS surveillance confirmed that AIDS surveillance is identifying 70-90% of all HIV-related deaths in men 25-44 years of age. Historically, AIDS surveillance has emphasized reporting from hospitals. Efforts to maintain current levels of reporting, or to improve reporting, are challenged by the growth of the epidemic and by the increasing role of outpatient diagnosis of AIDS.
艾滋病监测数据被广泛用于制定艾滋病病毒干预政策,而这些数据的有效性取决于其完整性。我们回顾了州和地方卫生部门关于艾滋病报告完整性的研究。这些研究通过替代数据来源识别艾滋病病例,如死亡证明、医院出院记录、疾病登记或用药记录。在大多数情况下,通过这些研究检测出的艾滋病病例中有超过80%已被报告,尽管在一些门诊机构中报告水平较低。对生命记录和艾滋病监测的比较证实,艾滋病监测识别出了25至44岁男性中所有与艾滋病病毒相关死亡病例的70%至90%。从历史上看,艾滋病监测一直强调来自医院的报告。随着疫情的蔓延以及艾滋病门诊诊断作用的日益增强,维持当前报告水平或提高报告水平面临着挑战。