• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用初级保健中多个质量指标的汇总指标:汇总质量指数(SQUID)。

Using a summary measure for multiple quality indicators in primary care: the Summary QUality InDex (SQUID).

作者信息

Nietert Paul J, Wessell Andrea M, Jenkins Ruth G, Feifer Chris, Nemeth Lynne S, Ornstein Steven M

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2007 Apr 2;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-11.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-2-11
PMID:17407560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1852570/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing the quality of primary care is becoming a priority in national healthcare agendas. Audit and feedback on healthcare quality performance indicators can help improve the quality of care provided. In some instances, fewer numbers of more comprehensive indicators may be preferable. This paper describes the use of the Summary Quality Index (SQUID) in tracking quality of care among patients and primary care practices that use an electronic medical record (EMR). All practices are part of the Practice Partner Research Network, representing over 100 ambulatory care practices throughout the United States.

METHODS

The SQUID is comprised of 36 process and outcome measures, all of which are obtained from the EMR. This paper describes algorithms for the SQUID calculations, various statistical properties, and use of the SQUID within the context of a multi-practice quality improvement (QI) project.

RESULTS

At any given time point, the patient-level SQUID reflects the proportion of recommended care received, while the practice-level SQUID reflects the average proportion of recommended care received by that practice's patients. Using quarterly reports, practice- and patient-level SQUIDs are provided routinely to practices within the network. The SQUID is responsive, exhibiting highly significant (p < 0.0001) increases during a major QI initiative, and its internal consistency is excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). Feedback from physicians has been extremely positive, providing a high degree of face validity.

CONCLUSION

The SQUID algorithm is feasible and straightforward, and provides a useful QI tool. Its statistical properties and clear interpretation make it appealing to providers, health plans, and researchers.

摘要

背景

评估初级保健质量正成为国家医疗保健议程中的一项优先事项。对医疗质量绩效指标进行审核和反馈有助于提高所提供的医疗服务质量。在某些情况下,较少数量但更全面的指标可能更可取。本文描述了在使用电子病历(EMR)的患者和初级保健机构中,使用汇总质量指数(SQUID)来跟踪医疗质量的情况。所有机构都是实践伙伴研究网络的一部分,代表了美国各地100多个门诊医疗机构。

方法

SQUID由36项过程和结果指标组成,所有这些指标均从EMR中获取。本文描述了SQUID计算的算法、各种统计特性,以及在多机构质量改进(QI)项目背景下SQUID的使用情况。

结果

在任何给定时间点,患者层面的SQUID反映了所接受的推荐治疗的比例,而机构层面的SQUID反映了该机构患者所接受的推荐治疗的平均比例。通过季度报告,定期向网络内的机构提供机构层面和患者层面的SQUID。SQUID具有响应性,在一项重大QI倡议期间呈现出高度显著(p < 0.0001)的增长,其内部一致性极佳(Cronbach's alpha = 0.93)。医生的反馈非常积极,具有很高的表面效度。

结论

SQUID算法可行且简单,提供了一个有用的QI工具。其统计特性和清晰的解释使其对提供者、健康计划和研究人员具有吸引力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/918146e92ee5/1748-5908-2-11-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/52c047e3267d/1748-5908-2-11-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/7f24533f2798/1748-5908-2-11-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/918146e92ee5/1748-5908-2-11-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/52c047e3267d/1748-5908-2-11-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/7f24533f2798/1748-5908-2-11-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1c9/1852570/918146e92ee5/1748-5908-2-11-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a summary measure for multiple quality indicators in primary care: the Summary QUality InDex (SQUID).使用初级保健中多个质量指标的汇总指标:汇总质量指数(SQUID)。
Implement Sci. 2007 Apr 2;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-11.
2
3
Improving the translation of research into primary care practice: results of a national quality improvement demonstration project.提高研究成果向基层医疗实践的转化:一项全国质量改进示范项目的结果
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Jul;34(7):379-90. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34048-3.
4
Development of a core set of quality indicators for paediatric primary care practices in Europe, COSI-PPC-EU.开发一套欧洲儿科初级保健实践的核心质量指标,COSIPPC-EU。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;177(6):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3140-z. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
5
A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial.一项旨在改善心血管疾病预防护理的多方法质量改进干预措施:一项整群随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):523-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00008.
6
Keeping it real--building an ROI model for an ambulatory EMR initiative that the physician practices espouse.实事求是——为医生诊所所支持的门诊电子病历计划构建一个投资回报率模型。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Winter;20(1):42-52.
7
Access to automated comparative feedback reports in primary care - a study of intensity of use and relationship with clinical performance among Swedish primary care practices.初级保健中自动化比较反馈报告的获取 - 对瑞典初级保健实践中使用强度及其与临床绩效关系的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10407-9.
8
Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars.从初级保健有意义使用范例中学习。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):360-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140219.
9
Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices.美国中小型初级保健实践中质量改进策略的使用。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S35-S43. doi: 10.1370/afm.2172.
10
Enhancing system-wide implementation of opioid prescribing guidelines in primary care: protocol for a stepped-wedge quality improvement project.加强初级保健中阿片类药物处方指南的全系统实施:一项阶梯式楔形质量改进项目的方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3227-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一种促进新加坡健康行为的乳腺癌幸存者跨专业社区(BASIC)共享护理模式:一项试点随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z.
2
Results from the BETTER WISE trial: a pragmatic cluster two arm parallel randomized controlled trial for primary prevention and screening in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.BETTER WISE 试验结果:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,初级保健中针对初级预防和筛查的实用两臂平行随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 28;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02159-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Does ambulatory process of care predict health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with chronic disease?慢性病患者的门诊护理流程能否预测其健康相关生活质量结果?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):63-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00604.x.
2
Improving diabetes care through a multicomponent quality improvement model in a practice-based research network.通过基于实践的研究网络中的多组分质量改进模型改善糖尿病护理。
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):34-41. doi: 10.1177/1062860606295206.
3
The logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices.
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Health Care for Chronic Conditions in Canada: Protocol for a Retrospective Pre-Post Study Using National Practice-Based Research Network Data.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行对加拿大慢性病初级卫生保健的影响:一项使用基于全国实践的研究网络数据的回顾性前后研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 21;12:e49131. doi: 10.2196/49131.
4
The BETTER WISE protocol: building on existing tools to improve cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care for wellness of cancer survivors and patients - a cluster randomized controlled trial embedded in a mixed methods design.BETTER WISE 方案:利用现有工具改善初级保健中的癌症和慢性病预防与筛查,提高癌症幸存者和患者的健康水平 - 一项混合方法设计中的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 26;18(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4839-y.
5
BETTER HEALTH: Durham -- protocol for a cluster randomized trial of BETTER in community and public health settings.改善健康:达勒姆——在社区和公共卫生环境中进行BETTER集群随机试验的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4797-3.
6
Moderate mental illness as a predictor of chronic disease prevention and screening.中度精神疾病作为慢性病预防和筛查的预测指标。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 17;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0645-x.
7
Creating Unidimensional Global Measures of Physician Practice Quality Based on Health Insurance Claims Data.基于医疗保险理赔数据创建医生执业质量的单维全局指标
Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun;52(3):1061-1078. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12533. Epub 2016 Jul 24.
8
Supporting primary care public health functions.支持基层医疗公共卫生功能。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jul;62(7):603.
9
Implementing and evaluating a program to facilitate chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: a mixed methods program evaluation.在初级保健中实施和评估一项促进慢性病预防与筛查的项目:一项混合方法的项目评估
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 8;9:135. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0135-7.
10
Systematic monitoring of male circumcision scale-up in Nyanza, Kenya: exploratory factor analysis of service quality instrument and performance ranking.肯尼亚尼扬扎男性包皮环切术推广的系统监测:服务质量工具的探索性因素分析及绩效排名
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101235. eCollection 2014.
在全国基层医疗实践网络中,为提高对临床实践指南的依从性而采取多方法干预措施背后的逻辑。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):65-88. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284443.
4
Putting smart money to work for quality improvement.让行家为质量改进发挥作用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1318-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00414.x.
5
The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.退伍军人健康管理局:质量、价值、问责制以及信息作为以患者为中心的护理的变革策略。
Healthc Pap. 2005;5(4):10-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpap..17381.
6
Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).基层医疗中整群随机试验的组内相关系数:胆固醇教育与研究试验(CEART)。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr;26(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.002.
7
A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial.一项旨在改善心血管疾病预防护理的多方法质量改进干预措施:一项整群随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):523-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00008.
8
Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study.评估十二个社区的医疗质量:持续质量改进研究结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun;23(3):247-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.247.
9
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.质量改进策略与项目有效性的系统评价
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):298-303. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.298.
10
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.美国为成年人提供的医疗保健质量。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.