Kahn Katherine L, Tisnado Diana M, Adams John L, Liu Honghu, Chen Wen-Pin, Hu Fang Ashlee, Mangione Carol M, Hays Ronald D, Damberg Cheryl L
Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, 911 Broxton Plaza, Box 951736, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1736, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):63-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00604.x.
The validity of quality of care measurement has important implications for practicing clinicians, their patients, and all involved with health care delivery. We used empirical data from managed care patients enrolled in west coast physician organizations to test the hypothesis that observed changes in health-related quality of life across a 2.5-year window reflecting process of care.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Patient self-report data as well as clinically detailed medical record review regarding 963 patients with chronic disease associated with managed care from three west coast states.
Prospective cohort study of change in health-related quality of life scores across 30 months as measured by change in SF-12 physical component scores.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patient self-report and medical record abstraction.
We found a positive relationship between better process scores and higher burden of illness (p<.05). After adjustment for burden of illness, using an instrumental variables approach revealed better process is associated with smaller declines in SF-12 scores across a 30-month observation window (p=.014). The application of the best quartile of process of care to patients currently receiving poor process is associated with a 4.24 increment in delta SF-12-physical component summary scores.
The use of instrumental variables allowed us to demonstrate a significant relationship between better ambulatory process of care and better health-related quality of life. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to improve the process of care.
医疗质量测量的有效性对执业临床医生、他们的患者以及所有参与医疗服务的人员都具有重要意义。我们使用了来自西海岸医生组织中参加管理式医疗的患者的实证数据,以检验以下假设:在2.5年的时间范围内观察到的与健康相关的生活质量变化反映了医疗过程。
数据来源/研究背景:来自西海岸三个州的963名患有与管理式医疗相关的慢性病患者的患者自我报告数据以及临床详细病历审查。
通过SF-12身体成分评分的变化来衡量30个月内与健康相关的生活质量评分变化的前瞻性队列研究。
数据收集/提取方法:患者自我报告和病历摘要。
我们发现更好的医疗过程评分与更高的疾病负担之间存在正相关关系(p<0.05)。在对疾病负担进行调整后,使用工具变量法显示,在30个月的观察期内,更好的医疗过程与SF-12评分的较小下降相关(p=0.014)。将最佳四分位数的医疗过程应用于目前接受较差医疗过程的患者,与SF-12身体成分汇总评分的增量增加4.24相关。
使用工具变量使我们能够证明更好的门诊医疗过程与更好的与健康相关的生活质量之间存在显著关系。这一发现强调了努力改善医疗过程的重要性。