Cheema Bobby, Abas Haifa, Smith Benjamin, O'Sullivan Anthony, Chan Maria, Patwardhan Aditi, Kelly John, Gillin Adrian, Pang Glen, Lloyd Brad, Singh Maria Fiatarone
School of Exercise and Sport Science and Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 May;18(5):1594-601. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006121329. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
Skeletal muscle wasting is common and insidious in patients who receive maintenance hemodialysis treatment for the management of ESRD. The objective of this study was to determine whether 12 wk of high-intensity, progressive resistance training (PRT) administered during routine hemodialysis treatment could improve skeletal muscle quantity and quality versus usual care. Forty-nine patients (62.6 +/- 14.2 yr; 0.3 to 16.7 yr on dialysis) were recruited from the outpatient hemodialysis unit of the St. George Public Hospital (Sydney, Australia). Patients were randomized to PRT + usual care (n = 24) or usual care control only (n = 25). The PRT group performed two sets of 10 exercises at a high intensity (15 to 17/20 on the Borg Scale) using free weights, three times per week for 12 wk during routine hemodialysis treatment. Primary outcomes included thigh muscle quantity (cross-sectional area [CSA]) and quality (intramuscular lipid content via attenuation) evaluated by computed tomography scan. Secondary outcomes included muscle strength, exercise capacity, body circumference measures, proinflammatory cytokine C-reactive protein, and quality of life. There was no statistically significant difference in muscle CSA change between groups. However, there were statistically significant improvements in muscle attenuation, muscle strength, mid-thigh and mid-arm circumference, body weight, and C-reactive protein in the PRT group relative to the nonexercising control group. These findings suggest that patients with ESRD can improve skeletal muscle quality and derive other health-related adaptations solely by engaging in a 12-wk high-intensity PRT regimen during routine hemodialysis treatment sessions. Longer training durations or more sensitive analysis techniques may be required to document alterations in muscle CSA.
对于接受维持性血液透析治疗以管理终末期肾病(ESRD)的患者而言,骨骼肌萎缩很常见且隐匿。本研究的目的是确定在常规血液透析治疗期间进行12周的高强度渐进性抗阻训练(PRT)与常规护理相比,是否能改善骨骼肌的数量和质量。从澳大利亚悉尼圣乔治公立医院的门诊血液透析科招募了49名患者(62.6±14.2岁;透析0.3至16.7年)。患者被随机分为PRT+常规护理组(n = 24)或仅常规护理对照组(n = 25)。PRT组在常规血液透析治疗期间,每周三次,每次使用自由重量器械进行两组10项高强度(Borg量表评分为15至17/20)的锻炼,持续12周。主要结局包括通过计算机断层扫描评估的大腿肌肉量(横截面积[CSA])和质量(通过衰减评估的肌内脂质含量)。次要结局包括肌肉力量、运动能力、身体周长测量、促炎细胞因子C反应蛋白和生活质量。两组之间肌肉CSA变化无统计学显著差异。然而,与非运动对照组相比,PRT组在肌肉衰减、肌肉力量、大腿中部和上臂中部周长、体重和C反应蛋白方面有统计学显著改善。这些发现表明,ESRD患者仅通过在常规血液透析治疗期间进行12周的高强度PRT方案,就可以改善骨骼肌质量并获得其他与健康相关的适应性变化。可能需要更长的训练时间或更敏感的分析技术来记录肌肉CSA的变化。