AIDS. 2007 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S37-48. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000266456.03397.d3.
To use a common ethnographic study protocol across five countries to provide data to confirm social and risk settings and risk behaviors, develop the assessment instruments, tailor the intervention, design a process evaluation of the intervention, and design an understandable informed consent process.
Methods determined best for capturing the core data elements were selected. Standards for data collection methods were established to enable comparable implementation of the ethnographic study across the five countries.
The methods selected were participant observation, focus groups, open-ended interviews, and social mapping. Standards included adhering to core data elements, number of participants, mode of data collection, type of data collection instrument, number of data collectors at each type of activity, duration of each type of activity, and type of informed consent administered. Sites had discretion in selecting which methods to use to obtain specific data.
The ethnographic studies provided input to the Trial's methods for data collection, described social groups in the target communities, depicted sexual practices, and determined core opinion leader characteristics; thus providing information that drove the adaptation of the intervention and facilitated the selection of venues, behavioral outcomes, and community popular opinion leaders (C-POLs).
The described rapid ethnographic approach worked well across the five countries, where findings allowed local adaptation of the intervention. When introducing the C-POL intervention in new areas, local non-governmental and governmental community and health workers can use this rapid ethnographic approach to identify the communities, social groups, messages, and C-POLs best suited for local implementation.
在五个国家采用通用的人种学研究方案,以提供数据来确认社会和风险环境及风险行为,开发评估工具,调整干预措施,设计干预措施的过程评估,并设计一个易懂的知情同意流程。
选择最适合获取核心数据元素的方法。建立数据收集方法标准,以便在五个国家可比地开展人种学研究。
选择的方法包括参与观察、焦点小组、开放式访谈和社会绘图。标准包括遵循核心数据元素、参与者数量、数据收集方式、数据收集工具类型、每种活动的数据收集者数量、每种活动的持续时间以及所实施的知情同意类型。各研究地点可自行决定使用哪些方法来获取特定数据。
人种学研究为试验的数据收集方法提供了依据,描述了目标社区中的社会群体,描绘了性行为,并确定了核心意见领袖的特征;从而提供了推动干预措施调整的信息,并有助于选择场所、行为结果和社区民意领袖(C-POL)。
所描述的快速人种学方法在五个国家效果良好,研究结果使干预措施能够因地制宜。在新地区引入C-POL干预措施时,当地非政府和政府社区及卫生工作者可使用这种快速人种学方法来确定最适合当地实施的社区、社会群体、信息和C-POL。