Iwasaki Motoki, Okuda Shin'ya, Miyauchi Akira, Sakaura Hironobu, Mukai Yoshihiro, Yonenobu Kazuo, Yoshikawa Hideki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):654-60. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257566.91177.cb.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 27 patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) for treatment of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). OBJECTIVES: To compare surgical outcome of ADF with that of laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the period 1986 and 1996, laminoplasty was the only surgical treatment selected for cervical myelopathy at our institutions. According to surgical results of laminoplasty performed during this period, we have performed either laminoplasty or ADF for patients with OPLL since 1996. METHODS: We reviewed clinical data obtained in 27 patients who underwent ADF between 1996 and 2003. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (range, 2-10 years). Surgical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Surgical results of ADF were compared with those of laminoplasty, which was performed in 66 patients during the period 1986 and 1996. RESULTS: ADF yielded a better neurologic outcome at final follow-up than laminoplasty in patients with occupying ratio > or =60%, although graft complications occurred in 15% and additional surgical intervention was required in 26%. Neither occupying ratio of OPLL, sagittal shape of ossification, nor cervical alignment was found to be related to surgical outcome of ADF. CONCLUSIONS: Although ADF is technically demanding and has a higher incidence of surgery-related complications, it is preferable to laminoplasty for patients with occupying ratio of OPLL > or =60%.
研究设计:对27例因后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)导致的颈椎脊髓病而接受前路减压融合术(ADF)的患者进行回顾性研究。 目的:比较ADF与椎板成形术的手术效果。 背景资料总结:在1986年至1996年期间,椎板成形术是我们机构治疗颈椎脊髓病的唯一手术选择。根据在此期间进行的椎板成形术的手术结果,自1996年以来,我们对OPLL患者进行了椎板成形术或ADF。 方法:我们回顾了1996年至2003年期间接受ADF的27例患者的临床资料。平均随访时间为6.0年(范围2 - 10年)。使用日本骨科学会(JOA)颈椎脊髓病评分系统评估手术效果。将ADF的手术结果与1986年至1996年期间对66例患者进行的椎板成形术的结果进行比较。 结果:在占位率≥60%的患者中,ADF在末次随访时的神经功能结果优于椎板成形术,尽管15%的患者出现植骨并发症,26%的患者需要额外的手术干预。未发现OPLL的占位率、骨化的矢状面形态或颈椎对线与ADF的手术结果相关。 结论:尽管ADF技术要求高且手术相关并发症发生率较高,但对于OPLL占位率≥60%的患者,ADF优于椎板成形术。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011-2
EFORT Open Rev. 2025-6-2
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-4-17
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024-9-18