Wang Yongping, Chen Xiao, Luo Yuan, Chen Chang, Cui Ran
Department of Orthopedics, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, China.
Department of Rehabilitation, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40675. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040675.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the influence of K-line status on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (OPLL).
We searched PubMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for English-language literature related to K-line and OPLL up to June 7, 2024. The study underwent rigorous selection, quality assessment, and data extraction, followed by meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0 software. This study has been registered with the international PROSPERO registry (registration number: CRD42024558578).
Seventeen articles encompassing 1247 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients with a positive K-line (K-line (+)) exhibited significantly enhanced Japanese Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate (mean differences [MD] = 19.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.28-26.28, P < .00001), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (MD = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.64-2.37, P = .0007), C2-C7 Cobb angle (MD = 6.45, 95% CI: 3.73-9.17, P < .00001), alongside reduced occupation ratio (MD = -7.67, 95% CI: -10.86 to -4.49, P < .00001), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (MD = -6.18, 95% CI: -8.36 to -3.99, P < .00001), and neck disability index (MD = -1.85, 95% CI: -3.18 to -0.52, P = .006) at final follow-up compared to those with a negative K-line (K-line (-)). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complication rates (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.41-3.20, P = .79), final follow-up visual analog scale scores (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.80 to 0.59, P = .77), or T1 slope (MD = 2.66, 95% CI: -0.20 to 5.52, P = .07) between the 2 groups.
A positive preoperative K-line (K-line (+)) is a better predictor of prognosis and is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with multi-segmental cervical OPLL compared to a negative K-line (K-line (-)).
进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估K线状态对颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者术后临床结局的影响。
我们检索了截至2024年6月7日的PubMed、Embase、OVID、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库,以查找与K线和OPLL相关的英文文献。该研究经过严格的筛选、质量评估和数据提取,随后使用Review Manager 5.3和Stata 17.0软件进行荟萃分析。本研究已在国际PROSPERO注册中心注册(注册号:CRD42024558578)。
纳入了17篇文章,共1247例患者。荟萃分析显示,与K线阴性(K线(-))的患者相比,K线阳性(K线(+))的患者在末次随访时日本骨科协会评分恢复率显著提高(平均差值[MD]=19.28,95%置信区间[CI]:12.28 - 26.28,P<.00001)、日本骨科协会评分(MD = 1.51,95% CI:0.64 - 2.37,P = .0007)、C2 - C7 Cobb角(MD = 6.45,95% CI:3.73 - 9.17,P<.00001),同时占用率降低(MD = -7.67,95% CI:-10.86至-4.49,P<.00001)、C2 - C7矢状垂直轴(MD = -6.18,95% CI:-8.36至-3.99,P<.00001)和颈部功能障碍指数(MD = -1.85,95% CI:-3.18至-0.52,P = .006)。两组术后并发症发生率(优势比 = 1.15,95% CI:0.41 - 3.20,P = .79)、末次随访视觉模拟量表评分(MD = -0.10,95% CI:-0.80至0.59,P = .77)或T1斜率(MD = 2.66,95% CI:-0.20至5.52,P = .07)无显著差异。
与K线阴性(K线(-))相比,术前K线阳性(K线(+))对多节段颈椎OPLL患者的预后是更好的预测指标,且与改善的临床结局相关。