Wright Ian P, Eisenstein Stephen M
Centre for Spinal Studies, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):772-4; discussion 775. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad.
Review of clinical file information and postoperative imaging, collected prospectively over a period of 14 years, in anticipation of study.
After anterior cervical discectomy and bone grafting for cervical radiculopathy or the intractable pain of cervical spondylosis, common clinical practice varies widely between the extremes of internal fixation in all cases, and never applying fixation. The clinical information and relevant imaging of 97 consecutive patients, 46 male, was reviewed at 12 months after surgery.
All surgery was performed at no more than 2 contiguous levels, by one surgeon (S.M.E.). After anterior discectomy alone, or combined with posterior vertebral body margin osteophytectomy, anterior bone grafting (Smith-Robinson) was performed at each level using a tricortical autogenous iliac crest bone block inserted under compression. In the interests of maximizing resource allocation and minimizing potential complications, all surgery was completed without internal fixation. A postoperative semirigid cervical collar was prescribed for 2 months.
In 54 patients having 1-level fusion, there were 6 pseudarthroses (11%). In 43 patients having 2-level fusion, 12 patients demonstrated pseudarthroses (28% of patients) at a total of 18 levels (21% of levels). Only 2 of the 97 patients had pain related to the donor site.
These results tend to confirm published reports of high pseudarthrosis rates in anterior cervical fusions carried out at 2 or more levels without fixation, as against improved fusion rates when internal fixation is applied. The authors are inclined to change their practice to include internal fixation in the form of anterior plating for fusions carried out at more than one level. Patients with technically successful fusions were less likely to have postoperative neck pain. Donor site pain was not a significant postoperative complication.
回顾前瞻性收集的14年期间的临床档案信息和术后影像学资料,为研究做准备。
1)评估在未进行内固定的情况下实现颈椎前路融合的技术成功率;2)评估与融合技术成功或失败相关的术后颈部疼痛;3)评估取自髂嵴的骨移植供区的发病率。
在因神经根型颈椎病或颈椎病顽固性疼痛行颈椎前路椎间盘切除及植骨术后,常见的临床实践在所有病例均进行内固定和从不应用固定这两个极端之间差异很大。对97例连续患者(46例男性)术后12个月的临床信息及相关影像学资料进行回顾。
所有手术均由一名外科医生(S.M.E.)在不超过连续2个节段进行。仅行前路椎间盘切除或联合椎体后缘骨赘切除术后,在每个节段使用一块压缩下植入的三皮质自体髂嵴骨块进行前路植骨(Smith-Robinson法)。为了最大限度地合理分配资源并将潜在并发症降至最低,所有手术均未进行内固定。术后佩戴半刚性颈托2个月。
在54例行单节段融合的患者中,有6例假关节形成(11%)。在43例行双节段融合的患者中,12例患者出现假关节形成(占患者的28%),共18个节段(占节段的21%)。97例患者中只有2例有与供区相关的疼痛。
这些结果倾向于证实已发表的报告,即2个或更多节段的颈椎前路融合在未行固定时假关节形成率较高,而应用内固定时融合率有所提高。作者倾向于改变其做法,对于多节段融合采用前路钢板形式的内固定。技术上融合成功的患者术后颈部疼痛的可能性较小。供区疼痛不是显著的术后并发症。