Kim W D, Eidelman D H, Izquierdo J L, Ghezzo H, Saetta M P, Cosio M G
Respiratory Division of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Dec;144(6):1385-90. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.6.1385.
In order to investigate the hypothesis that different morphologic patterns of disease might correspond to different mechanical properties of the lung in emphysema, pulmonary function tests and lung mechanics were measured in 34 subjects undergoing lung resection for peripheral lung tumors. Using standard microscopic criteria, pure or predominant centrilobular (n = 18) or panlobular (n = 16) emphysema was diagnosed in lungs. The degree of emphysema measured by the mean linear intercept (Lm) was not significantly different between the two groups. However, the coefficient of variation of the interalveolar wall distance (CV) was significantly higher for the same Lm in CLE than in PLE. This indicates that CLE has an uneven pattern of destruction, whereas PLE is more homogeneous. CLE had a higher degree of abnormalities in the small airways (SAD) than did PLE (p less than 0.05) mainly because of significantly higher muscle score (p less than 0.001) and fibrosis. CLE also had a higher proportion of airways less than 400 microns in diameter than did PLE (p less than 0.05). Static compliance, specific compliance, and the exponential constant (K) were significantly lower (p less than 0.005, p less than 0.001, and p less than 0.05, respectively) in CLE than in PLE. FEV1/FVC was significantly correlated with SAD in CLE (r = -0.69, p less than 0.01) but not in PLE (r = 0.29 p greater than 0.05); conversely, FEV1/FVC was significantly correlated with elasticity (K) in PLE (r = -0.72, p less than 0.01) but not in CLE (r = 0.08, p greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了研究肺气肿中不同疾病形态模式可能对应肺不同力学特性的假说,对34例因周围型肺肿瘤接受肺切除术的患者进行了肺功能测试和肺力学测量。根据标准显微镜标准,在肺中诊断出单纯或主要为小叶中心型(n = 18)或全小叶型(n = 16)肺气肿。两组间通过平均线性截距(Lm)测量的肺气肿程度无显著差异。然而,对于相同的Lm,小叶中心型肺气肿(CLE)的肺泡壁间距变异系数(CV)显著高于全小叶型肺气肿(PLE)。这表明CLE具有不均匀的破坏模式,而PLE更为均匀。CLE的小气道异常程度(SAD)高于PLE(p < 0.05),主要是因为肌肉评分显著更高(p < 0.001)和纤维化。CLE直径小于400微米的气道比例也高于PLE(p < 0.05)。CLE的静态顺应性、比顺应性和指数常数(K)显著低于PLE(分别为p < 0.005、p < 0.001和p < 0.05)。在CLE中,FEV1/FVC与SAD显著相关(r = -0.69,p < 0.01),而在PLE中不相关(r = 0.29,p > 0.05);相反,在PLE中,FEV1/FVC与弹性(K)显著相关(r = -0.72,p < 0.01),而在CLE中不相关(r = 0.08,p > 0.05)。(摘要截断于250字)