Voskuil Dorien W, Monninkhof Evelyn M, Elias Sjoerd G, Vlems Femke A, van Leeuwen Flora E
Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Apr;16(4):639-48. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0742.
To assess the epidemiologic evidence for the association between physical activity and endometrial cancer risk, taking into account the methodologic quality of each study.
Systematic review, best evidence synthesis.
Studies were identified through a systematic review of literature available on PubMed through December 2006.
We included cohort and case-control studies that assessed total and/or leisure time and/or occupational activities in relation to the incidence of endometrial cancer. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed with a comprehensive scoring system.
The included cohort (n = 7) and case-control (n = 13) studies consistently show that physical activity is associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer. The best evidence synthesis showed that the majority (80%) of 10 high-quality studies found risk reductions of >20%. Pooling of seven high-quality cohort studies that measured total, leisure time, or occupational activity showed a significantly decreased risk of endometrial cancer (summary estimate: OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.85) for the most active women. Case control studies with relatively unfavorable quality scores reported divergent risk estimates, between 2-fold decreased and 2-fold increased risk. Effect modification by body mass index or menopausal status was not consistently observed. Evidence for an effect of physical activity during childhood or adolescence was limited.
Physical activity seems to be associated with a reduction in the risk of endometrial cancer, which is independent of body weight. Further studies, preferably prospective cohort studies, are needed to determine the magnitude of the risk reduction and to assess which aspects of physical activity contribute most strongly to the reduced risk and in which period of life physical activity is most effective.
考虑每项研究的方法学质量,评估体力活动与子宫内膜癌风险之间关联的流行病学证据。
系统评价,最佳证据综合分析。
通过对截至2006年12月在PubMed上可获取的文献进行系统检索来确定研究。
我们纳入了队列研究和病例对照研究,这些研究评估了与子宫内膜癌发病率相关的总体力活动和/或休闲时间体力活动和/或职业活动。采用综合评分系统评估研究的方法学质量。
纳入的队列研究(n = 7)和病例对照研究(n = 13)一致表明,体力活动与子宫内膜癌风险降低相关。最佳证据综合分析显示,10项高质量研究中的大多数(80%)发现风险降低超过20%。对7项测量总体力活动、休闲时间体力活动或职业活动的高质量队列研究进行汇总分析显示,最活跃的女性患子宫内膜癌的风险显著降低(汇总估计值:OR,0.77;95%CI,0.70 - 0.85)。质量评分相对较差的病例对照研究报告的风险估计值存在差异,风险降低2倍至增加2倍不等。未一致观察到体重指数或绝经状态的效应修正。儿童期或青春期体力活动影响的证据有限。
体力活动似乎与子宫内膜癌风险降低相关,且与体重无关。需要进一步开展研究,最好是前瞻性队列研究,以确定风险降低的幅度,并评估体力活动的哪些方面对风险降低贡献最大,以及体力活动在生命的哪个阶段最有效。