Suppr超能文献

卵巢癌患者综合手术治疗的预测因素。

Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Goff Barbara A, Matthews Barbara J, Larson Eric H, Andrilla C Holly A, Wynn Michelle, Lishner Denise M, Baldwin Laura-Mae

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6460, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 May 15;109(10):2031-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22604.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing appropriate surgical treatment for women with ovarian cancer is one of the most effective ways to improve ovarian cancer outcomes. In this study, the authors identified factors that were associated with a measure of comprehensive surgery, so that interventions may be targeted appropriately to improve surgical care.

METHODS

Using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project hospital discharge data from 1999 to 2002 for 9 states, the authors identified 10,432 admissions of women who had an International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and who had undergone oophorectomy. Based on National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel recommendations, surgeries were categorized as comprehensive by using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes. Logistic regression analysis using data from 5 states with a full set of variables (n = 6854 patients)was used to identify factors that were associated with the receipt of comprehensive surgical care.

RESULTS

Overall, 66.9% of admissions (range, 46.3-80.8% of admissions) received comprehensive surgery. Factors that were associated independently with comprehensive surgical care included age (ages 21-50 years vs ages 71-80 years or > or = 81 years), race (Caucasian vs African American or Hispanic), payer (private insurance vs Medicaid), cancer stage (advanced vs early), annual surgeon volume (low/medium [2-9 surgeries per year] or high [>10 surgeries per year] vs very low [1 surgery per year]), and surgeon specialty (gynecologic oncologists vs obstetrician gynecologists or general surgeons). Among nonteaching hospitals, medium-volume hospitals (10-19 ovarian cancer surgeries per year) and high-volume hospitals (> or = 20 surgeries per year) had significantly higher comprehensive surgery rates than low-volume facilities (1-9 surgeries per year). Volume did not influence comprehensive surgery rates in teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Many women with ovarian cancer, especially those in poor, elderly, or minority groups, are not receiving recommended comprehensive surgery. Efforts should be made to ensure that all women with ovarian cancer, especially those in vulnerable populations, have the opportunity to receive care from centers or surgeons with higher comprehensive surgery rates.

摘要

背景

为卵巢癌女性提供恰当的手术治疗是改善卵巢癌治疗效果的最有效方法之一。在本研究中,作者确定了与综合手术措施相关的因素,以便能够针对性地进行干预,改善手术治疗。

方法

利用1999年至2002年9个州的医疗成本和利用项目医院出院数据,作者确定了10432例国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)原发性诊断为卵巢癌且接受了卵巢切除术的女性住院病例。根据美国国立卫生研究院共识小组的建议,通过使用ICD-9诊断和手术编码将手术分类为综合手术。使用来自5个州的具有全套变量的数据(n = 6854例患者)进行逻辑回归分析,以确定与接受综合手术治疗相关的因素。

结果

总体而言,66.9%的住院病例(范围为住院病例的46.3%-80.8%)接受了综合手术。与综合手术治疗独立相关的因素包括年龄(21-50岁与71-80岁或≥81岁)、种族(白种人与非裔美国人或西班牙裔)、付款人(私人保险与医疗补助)、癌症分期(晚期与早期)、外科医生年手术量(低/中[每年2-9例手术]或高[每年>10例手术]与极低[每年1例手术])以及外科医生专业(妇科肿瘤学家与妇产科医生或普通外科医生)。在非教学医院中,中等手术量医院(每年10-19例卵巢癌手术)和高手术量医院(每年≥20例手术)的综合手术率显著高于低手术量机构(每年1-9例手术)。手术量并未影响教学医院的综合手术率。

结论

许多卵巢癌女性,尤其是贫困、老年或少数群体的女性,未接受推荐的综合手术。应努力确保所有卵巢癌女性,尤其是弱势群体中的女性,有机会接受来自综合手术率较高的中心或外科医生的治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验