Naylor J M, Petrie L, Rodriguez M I, Skilnick P
Can Vet J. 1990 Nov;31(11):753-60.
Thirty-six diarrheic calves infected with rota- and coronaviruses were randomly allocated to one of three oral electrolyte treatments: Ion-Aid (Syntex Agribusiness), Life-Guard (Norden Inc), or Revibe (Langford Inc). The calves were also allowed voluntary access to milk which was offered at the rate of 5% of body weight per feeding in two feedings daily. There were significant differences in recovery rate among calves treated with the different electrolytes. Only 33% of Ion-Aid-treated calves recovered; Revibe- and Life-Guard-treated calves had high recovery rates of 92% and 83%, respectively. The much higher recovery rates with Life-Guard and Revibe were attributed to the presence of an alkalizing agent in these preparations. Life-Guard uses bicarbonate to counteract acidosis and there was some evidence that this may have interfered with milk digestion. Revibe uses acetate; this was effectively metabolized within the calves' tissues and produced alkalization without interference with milk digestion.
36头感染轮状病毒和冠状病毒的腹泻犊牛被随机分配到三种口服电解质疗法之一:Ion-Aid(先灵葆雅农业综合企业)、Life-Guard(诺登公司)或Revibe(兰福德公司)。这些犊牛还可以自愿饮用牛奶,每天分两次喂食,每次喂食量为体重的5%。接受不同电解质治疗的犊牛在恢复率上存在显著差异。接受Ion-Aid治疗的犊牛只有33%恢复;接受Revibe和Life-Guard治疗的犊牛恢复率较高,分别为92%和83%。Life-Guard和Revibe的恢复率高得多归因于这些制剂中存在一种碱化剂。Life-Guard使用碳酸氢盐来对抗酸中毒,有证据表明这可能干扰了牛奶消化。Revibe使用醋酸盐;它在犊牛组织内有效代谢并产生碱化作用,而不会干扰牛奶消化。