• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不要复苏医嘱——伦理和法律考量]

[Do-not-resuscitate orders--ethical and legal considerations].

作者信息

Ballin Nicola Hvidt

机构信息

Hvidovre Hospital, Gastroenheden, Medicinsk Sektion.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1201-4.

PMID:17425922
Abstract

The article is based on a structured literature review. Practicing DNR orders in Denmark has not yet been described and there are no national guidelines. Generally patients must give informed consent before do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Only 32% of competent patients are involved prior to the decision even though patients wish to talk about decisions regarding the end of life . In general doctors cannot predict patients' do-not-resuscitate preferences and doctors underestimate patients' self-estimated quality of life. Doctors rarely contact the Danish Living Will Registry. Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders may be subject to other therapeutic reductions. In conclusion, patient autonomy should also be respected in the case of do-not-resuscitate orders.

摘要

本文基于结构化文献综述。丹麦实施“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的情况尚未被描述,且没有国家指南。一般来说,患者在下达“不要复苏”医嘱之前必须给予知情同意。尽管患者希望谈论关于生命末期的决定,但在做出决定之前,只有32%的有行为能力的患者参与其中。一般而言,医生无法预测患者的“不要复苏”偏好,并且医生低估了患者自我估计的生活质量。医生很少联系丹麦生前预嘱登记处。有“不要复苏”医嘱的患者可能会接受其他治疗减少措施。总之,在“不要复苏”医嘱的情况下,患者的自主权也应得到尊重。

相似文献

1
[Do-not-resuscitate orders--ethical and legal considerations].[不要复苏医嘱——伦理和法律考量]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1201-4.
2
["Do not resuscitate" orders in Danish medical wards. A questionnaire].丹麦医疗病房中的“不要复苏”医嘱。一份调查问卷
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1205-8.
3
Advance directives and the concept of competence: are they a moral barrier to resuscitation?预立医疗指示与行为能力的概念:它们是复苏的道德障碍吗?
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;58 Suppl 5(Pt 2):477-84.
4
Do-not-resuscitate orders.不要复苏医嘱。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1994 Jan;81(1):30-4.
5
Ethical considerations and quality of life.伦理考量与生活质量。
Cardiovasc Clin. 1992;22(2):243-51.
6
[Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do not resuscitate orders].[心肺复苏与不要复苏医嘱]
Rev Med Chil. 2007 May;135(5):669-79. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
7
Informed consent and the ethical management of the older patient.知情同意与老年患者的伦理管理
Anesthesiol Clin. 2009 Sep;27(3):569-80, table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2009.07.016.
8
Psychological and legal aspects of mental incompetence.精神无行为能力的心理与法律层面
Tex Med. 1998 Mar;94(3):64-7.
9
Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years.25年后的“不要复苏”医嘱。
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1543-50. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000064743.44696.49.
10
The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act.“不要复苏”医嘱:与预先指示、医生专业以及《患者自主决定法案》实施15年后讨论记录的关联
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):642-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022517.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Estimation of Healthcare Costs in Potential 'Do Not Resuscitate' Cases.潜在“不要复苏”病例的心肺复苏结果及医疗成本估算
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016 Feb;16(1):e27-34. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 2.