Nøhr Katrine Backman, Andersen Berit Sanne, Greve Jan
Region Nord, Region Midtjylland, Videreuddannelsessekretariatet.
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1219-23.
The purpose of this study is to describe the scientific qualifications of younger physicians in residency in Denmark during 1998-2003.
Data consist of all applications for residency during 1998-2003 in 21 medical specialties. 1920 physicians in residency are included in the study. Connections between scientific activities and the residents' specialty and education (university, foundation year (1 year), and first year of specialist training) are investigated.
74% of young physicians in residency have scientific qualifications and 16% have a PhD or a doctor's degree. Scientific qualifications vary much between specialties. Physicians graduated from Aarhus University have higher scientific qualifications than physicians educated from the other universities; in essence because more have a PhD. Physicians with first year of specialist training from a university hospital have higher scientific qualifications than physicians with training from other hospitals. Foreign physicians have low scientific production. Physicians with a PhD or a doctor's degree have a significantly higher candidate age than the average for all residents, but it does not equal the time a PhD takes.
No reduction in residents' total scientific qualifications were found in the period 1998-2003, but there is a tendency towards greater spread in scientific qualifications among the residents. Specialty, university and first year of specialist training are all factors that influence young physicians' scientific activities.
本研究旨在描述1998年至2003年丹麦年轻住院医师的科研资质情况。
数据包括1998年至2003年期间21个医学专业所有住院医师申请材料。本研究纳入了1920名住院医师。调查科研活动与住院医师专业及教育背景（大学、基础年（1年）和专科培训第一年）之间的联系。
74%的年轻住院医师具备科研资质，16%拥有博士学位或医学博士学位。各专业的科研资质差异很大。毕业于奥胡斯大学的医师比毕业于其他大学的医师科研资质更高；本质上是因为前者获得博士学位的人数更多。在大学医院接受专科培训第一年的医师比在其他医院接受培训的医师科研资质更高。外国医师的科研产出较低。拥有博士学位或医学博士学位的医师候选人年龄显著高于所有住院医师的平均年龄，但这与获得博士学位所需时间并不等同。
1998年至2003年期间未发现住院医师总体科研资质有所下降，但住院医师科研资质的差异有扩大趋势。专业、大学和专科培训第一年都是影响年轻医师科研活动的因素。
