Lipsitch Marc, O'Hagan Justin J
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Oct 22;4(16):787-802. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0229.
Many of the remaining challenges in infectious disease control involve pathogens that fail to elicit long-lasting immunity in their hosts. Antigenic variation is a common reason for this failure and a contributor to the complexity of vaccine design. Diversifying selection by the host immune system is commonly, and often correctly, invoked to explain antigenic variability in pathogens. However, there is a wide variety of patterns of antigenic variation across space and time, and within and between hosts, and we do not yet understand the determinants of these different patterns. This review describes five such patterns, taking as examples two bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis), two viruses (influenza A and HIV-1), as well as the pathogens (taken as a group) for which antigenic variation is negligible. Pathogen-specific explanations for these patterns of diversity are critically evaluated, and the patterns are compared against predictions of theoretical models for antigenic diversity. Major remaining challenges are highlighted, including the identification of key protective antigens in bacteria, the design of vaccines to combat antigenic variability for viruses and the development of more systematic explanations for patterns of antigenic variation.
传染病控制中许多尚存的挑战都涉及那些无法在宿主体内引发持久免疫力的病原体。抗原变异是导致这种失败的常见原因,也是疫苗设计复杂性的一个因素。宿主免疫系统的多样化选择通常(且常常正确地)被用来解释病原体中的抗原变异性。然而,抗原变异在空间和时间上、宿主内部以及宿主之间存在各种各样的模式,而我们尚未了解这些不同模式的决定因素。本综述描述了五种这样的模式,以两种细菌(肺炎链球菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌)、两种病毒(甲型流感病毒和HIV-1)以及抗原变异可忽略不计的病原体(作为一个群体)为例。对这些多样性模式的病原体特异性解释进行了严格评估,并将这些模式与抗原多样性理论模型的预测进行了比较。突出了尚存的主要挑战,包括鉴定细菌中的关键保护性抗原、设计对抗病毒抗原变异性的疫苗以及为抗原变异模式开发更系统的解释。