Suppr超能文献

普通内科患者应激性溃疡的预防:证据综述

Stress-ulcer prophylaxis for general medical patients: a review of the evidence.

作者信息

Janicki Todd, Stewart Scott

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2007 Mar;2(2):86-92. doi: 10.1002/jhm.177.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric stress ulceration and bleeding are common occurrences in the critically ill and prophylactic acid-suppression is used almost universally in this population. Evidence suggests that general medical patients hospitalized outside of the intensive care unit often receive similar therapy.

PURPOSE

To determine how frequently general medical patients are prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis and what evidence exists for doing so.

DATA SOURCE

The MEDLINE database (1966 to October 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (4th Quarter 2005), and the bibliographies of selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that contained significant data about either the frequency of use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in general medical patients or gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in patients given prophylaxis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary author extracted prevalence and outcome data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive studies suggest that 20-25% of general medical patients receive acid suppression for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the absence of presumed (but not established) risk factors for bleeding. Only two randomized, controlled trials evaluated the effects of prophylaxis in this population. The first found a reduction in clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from 6% (3 of 48) with placebo to zero (n = 52) with magaldrate. The second found a reduction in clinically significant bleeding from 3% (2 of 70) with sucralfate to zero (n = 74) with cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

A significant number of general medical patients are prescribed acid-suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The literature provides only sparse guidance on this issue with two randomized trials showing a possible benefit for prophylaxis. Further study is needed.

摘要

背景

胃应激性溃疡和出血在危重症患者中很常见,预防性使用抑酸药物在这一人群中几乎被普遍采用。有证据表明,在重症监护病房以外住院的普通内科患者通常也接受类似的治疗。

目的

确定普通内科患者接受应激性溃疡预防治疗的频率以及这样做的依据。

数据来源

MEDLINE数据库(1966年至2005年10月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2005年第4季度)以及所选文章的参考文献。

研究选择

包含有关普通内科患者应激性溃疡预防治疗使用频率或接受预防治疗患者胃肠道出血结局的重要数据的研究。

数据提取

第一作者提取患病率和结局数据。

数据综合

描述性研究表明,在没有假定(但未证实)出血危险因素的情况下,20% - 25%的普通内科患者接受抑酸治疗以预防应激性溃疡。仅有两项随机对照试验评估了该人群预防治疗的效果。第一项试验发现,临床显著胃肠道出血率从安慰剂组的6%(48例中的3例)降至氢氧化铝镁组的零(n = 52)。第二项试验发现,临床显著出血率从硫糖铝组的3%(70例中的2例)降至西咪替丁组的零(n = 74)。

结论

大量普通内科患者被处方使用抑酸疗法预防应激性溃疡。关于这个问题,文献仅提供了很少的指导,两项随机试验显示预防治疗可能有益。需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验