Johnson-Schlitz Dena M, Flores Carlos, Engels William R
Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS Genet. 2007 Apr 13;3(4):e50. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030050. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
The analysis of double-strand break (DSB) repair is complicated by the existence of several pathways utilizing a large number of genes. Moreover, many of these genes have been shown to have multiple roles in DSB repair. To address this complexity we used a repair reporter construct designed to measure multiple repair outcomes simultaneously. This approach provides estimates of the relative usage of several DSB repair pathways in the premeiotic male germline of Drosophila. We applied this system to mutations at each of 11 repair loci plus various double mutants and altered dosage genotypes. Most of the mutants were found to suppress one of the pathways with a compensating increase in one or more of the others. Perhaps surprisingly, none of the single mutants suppressed more than one pathway, but they varied widely in how the suppression was compensated. We found several cases in which two or more loci were similar in which pathway was suppressed while differing in how this suppression was compensated. Taken as a whole, the data suggest that the choice of which repair pathway is used for a given DSB occurs by a two-stage "decision circuit" in which the DSB is first placed into one of two pools from which a specific pathway is then selected.
双链断裂(DSB)修复的分析因存在多种利用大量基因的途径而变得复杂。此外,这些基因中的许多已被证明在DSB修复中具有多种作用。为了解决这种复杂性,我们使用了一种修复报告构建体,旨在同时测量多种修复结果。这种方法提供了果蝇减数分裂前雄性生殖系中几种DSB修复途径相对使用情况的估计。我们将这个系统应用于11个修复位点中的每一个的突变以及各种双突变体和改变剂量的基因型。发现大多数突变体抑制了其中一种途径,同时一种或多种其他途径有补偿性增加。也许令人惊讶的是,没有一个单突变体抑制超过一种途径,但它们在抑制如何得到补偿方面差异很大。我们发现了几个案例,其中两个或更多位点在被抑制的途径方面相似,但在这种抑制如何得到补偿方面有所不同。总体而言,数据表明对于给定的DSB使用哪种修复途径的选择是通过一个两阶段的“决策电路”发生的,其中DSB首先被放入两个池中之一,然后从该池中选择特定的途径。