Kok Peter, van Doorn Arna, Kolk Herman
NICI, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain Lang. 2007 Sep;102(3):273-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
In this study we investigate the production of verb inflection in agrammatic aphasia. In a number of recent studies it has been argued that tense inflection is harder to produce for agrammatic individuals than agreement inflection. However, results are still inconclusive, at least for Dutch and German. Here, we report three experiments in which this matter is further investigated. Our first goal was to determine whether tense was indeed more difficult to produce than agreement. Also, we investigated whether error rates were influenced by computational load. The results for nine Dutch-speaking agrammatic participants generally indicated that tense was indeed harder to produce than agreement, but that for both types of inflection, the number of errors increased with computational load. Taking care of word order and inflection induced more errors than taking care of just inflection. These findings are discussed in relation to current processing and representational models of agrammatic production.
在本研究中,我们调查了语法缺失性失语症中动词词形变化的产生情况。在最近的一些研究中,有人认为,对于语法缺失者来说,时态词形变化比一致性词形变化更难产生。然而,至少对于荷兰语和德语来说,结果仍然没有定论。在此,我们报告了三项进一步研究此问题的实验。我们的首要目标是确定时态是否确实比一致性更难产生。此外,我们还研究了错误率是否受计算负荷的影响。九名说荷兰语的语法缺失参与者的结果总体表明,时态确实比一致性更难产生,但对于这两种词形变化类型,错误数量都随着计算负荷的增加而增加。处理词序和词形变化比仅处理词形变化会引发更多错误。我们将结合当前语法缺失性产出的加工和表征模型对这些发现进行讨论。