• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A reconceptualization of sentence production in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia: the synergistic processing bottleneck model.中风后语法缺失性失语中句子生成的重新概念化:协同加工瓶颈模型
Front Lang Sci. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/flang.2023.1118739. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Assessment of verb and sentence processing deficits in stroke-induced aphasia: the Italian version of the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS-I).中风所致失语症中动词和句子加工缺陷的评估:《西北动词与句子评估量表》意大利语版(NAVS-I)
Aphasiology. 2024;38(3):510-543. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2215494. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: behavioral and neural recovery patterns.训练语法缺失性失语症患者动词论元结构产生:行为和神经恢复模式。
Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2358-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
4
Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia.中风后和原发性进行性失语症的句法和形态句法处理。
Behav Neurol. 2013;26(1-2):35-54. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-110220.
5
Grammatical Impairments in PPA.原发性进行性失语中的语法障碍
Aphasiology. 2014 Sep;28(8-9):1018-1037. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.912744.
6
Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).失语症中的动词及句子产出与理解:西北动词与句子评估(NAVS)
Aphasiology. 2012;26(10):1250-1277. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.693584.
7
Cortical and structural-connectivity damage correlated with impaired syntactic processing in aphasia.皮质和结构连接损伤与失语症中句法处理受损相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 May;40(7):2153-2173. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24514. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Online sentence processing impairments in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Evidence from ERP.语法缺失型和命名性失语型原发性进行性失语症在线句子加工损伤:来自 ERP 的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jan 22;151:107728. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107728. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
A psychometric analysis of functional category production in English agrammatic narratives.英语语法缺失叙述中功能类别生成的心理测量分析。
Brain Lang. 2008 Apr;105(1):18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
10
Verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The influence of semantic class and argument structure properties on generalisation.语法缺失性失语症中的动词产出:语义类别和论元结构属性对泛化的影响。
Aphasiology. 2003 Jan;17(3):213-241. doi: 10.1080/729255456.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Priming in Aphasia: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Directions.失语症中的结构启动:现状综述与未来方向
Aphasiology. 2024 Dec 25. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2445660.
2
Translanguaging in conversations for people with aphasia living in Greater Johannesburg, South Africa.南非约翰内斯堡地区失语症患者对话中的语码转换
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2025 Feb 12;72(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1082.
3
Are Personal and Reflexive Pronouns Dissociated in Agrammatic Comprehension? An Individual Participant Meta-Analysis With Clinical Implications.在语法缺失性理解中,人称代词和反身代词是否分离?一项具有临床意义的个体参与者荟萃分析。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Dec 12;33(6S):3218-3235. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00343. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Agrammatic output in non-fluent, including Broca's, aphasia as a rational behavior.非流畅性失语(包括布罗卡失语)中的语法缺失是一种合理行为。
Aphasiology. 2023;37(12):1981-2000. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2143233. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
2
Grammar in 'agrammatical' aphasia: What's intact?语法在“不合语法的”失语症中:哪些是完整的?
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278676. eCollection 2022.
3
Can the resource reduction hypothesis explain sentence processing in aphasia? A visual world study in German.资源简化假说能否解释失语症患者的句子加工?一项德语的视域阅读研究。
Brain Lang. 2022 Dec;235:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105204. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.《严重程度校准失语症命名测验》
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2722-2740. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00071. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
Mediators, Moderators, and Covariates: Matching Analysis Approach for Improved Precision in Cognitive-Communication Rehabilitation Research.中介变量、调节变量和协变量:提高认知-沟通康复研究精度的匹配分析方法。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Nov 17;65(11):4159-4171. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00551. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
6
Revisiting the relation between syntax, action, and left BA44.重新审视句法、动作与左脑BA44区之间的关系。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:923022. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.923022. eCollection 2022.
7
Associations among depression, demographic variables, and language impairments in chronic post-stroke aphasia.慢性脑卒后失语症患者的抑郁、人口统计学变量和语言障碍之间的关系。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Nov-Dec;100:106266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106266. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Moving beyond domain-specific versus domain-general options in cognitive neuroscience.超越认知神经科学中的领域特定与领域一般选项。
Cortex. 2022 Sep;154:259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
A syntax-lexicon trade-off in language production.语言产生中的句法-词汇权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 21;119(25):e2120203119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120203119. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of syntactic and semantic processing in human inferior frontal gyrus.人类下额叶中句法和语义处理的独特时空模式。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1104-1111. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01334-6. Epub 2022 May 26.

中风后语法缺失性失语中句子生成的重新概念化:协同加工瓶颈模型

A reconceptualization of sentence production in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia: the synergistic processing bottleneck model.

作者信息

Faroqi-Shah Yasmeen

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Front Lang Sci. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/flang.2023.1118739. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

DOI:10.3389/flang.2023.1118739
PMID:39175803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340809/
Abstract

The language production deficit in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia (PSA-G) tends to result from lesions to the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and is characterized by a triad of symptoms: fragmented sentences, errors in functional morphology, and a dearth of verbs. Despite decades of research, the mechanisms underlying production patterns in PSA-G have been difficult to characterize. Two major impediments to progress may have been the view that it is a purely morphosyntactic disorder and the (sometimes overzealous) application of linguistic theory without interceding psycholinguistic evidence. In this paper, empirical evidence is examined to present an integrated portrait of language production in PSA-G and to evaluate the assumption of a syntax-specific syndrome. In light of extant evidence, it is proposed that agrammatic language production results from a combination of morphosyntactic, phonomotor, and processing capacity limitations that cause a cumulative processing bottleneck at the point of articulatory planning. This proposed Synergistic Processing Bottleneck model of PSA-G presents a testable framework for future research. The paper ends with recommendations for future research on PSA-G.

摘要

中风后语法缺失性失语(PSA-G)中的语言产出缺陷往往源于左侧额下回(LIFG)的损伤,其特征为一组三联征症状:句子碎片化、功能形态错误以及动词匮乏。尽管经过了数十年的研究,但PSA-G中语言产出模式背后的机制仍难以描述。取得进展的两个主要障碍可能是认为它是一种纯粹的形态句法障碍,以及(有时过于热心地)在没有心理语言学证据介入的情况下应用语言理论。在本文中,我们审视了实证证据,以呈现PSA-G中语言产出的综合图景,并评估特定于句法的综合征这一假设。根据现有证据,有人提出语法缺失性语言产出是形态句法、语音运动和处理能力限制共同作用的结果,这些限制在发音计划阶段造成了累积性的处理瓶颈。这个提出的PSA-G协同处理瓶颈模型为未来研究提供了一个可检验的框架。本文最后给出了关于PSA-G未来研究的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/83775b9a6bb1/nihms-2015523-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/2d68a2f53874/nihms-2015523-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/7fcd6088010e/nihms-2015523-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/39f896ee0dac/nihms-2015523-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/6ef17135d743/nihms-2015523-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/6edd9f3723e6/nihms-2015523-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/83775b9a6bb1/nihms-2015523-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/2d68a2f53874/nihms-2015523-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/7fcd6088010e/nihms-2015523-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/39f896ee0dac/nihms-2015523-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/6ef17135d743/nihms-2015523-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/6edd9f3723e6/nihms-2015523-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893c/11340809/83775b9a6bb1/nihms-2015523-f0006.jpg