Suppr超能文献

静脉注射和口服胺碘酮用于治疗地高辛给药后近期发生的心房颤动。

Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration.

作者信息

Xanthos Theodoros, Bassiakou Eleni, Vlachos Ioannis S, Bassiakos Sotirios, Michalakis Konstantinos, Moutzouris Dimitris-Anestis, Papadimitriou Lila

机构信息

University of Athens Medical School Department of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 18;121(3):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic drug. The safety and efficacy of oral versus intravenous (i.v.) Amiodarone in the treatment of AF of recent onset (duration <48 h) was investigated.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 223 patients with symptomatic AF, of whom 110 received 600 mg oral Amiodarone (Group A) in three divided doses and 113 received i.v. Amiodarone (5 mg/kg over 30 min followed by 1000 mg over the next 24 h) (Group B). Digoxin was administered to all patients, who had not previously received it. All patients were monitored for 24 h.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 85.45% of group A and 82.30% in group B (p=NS). Mean time of cardioversion in group A was 20+/-4.5 h and in group B was 12+/-8 h (p<0,001). However, blood pressure (BP) in group A remained stable for the observation period, whereas it fell significantly in group B. Treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients in either group, however 13 patients in group B developed superficial phlebitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both forms of the drug are extremely efficient in restoring sinus rhythm in AF of recent onset, although the i.v. form acts quicker. The oral form of the drug does not alter significantly the patients' BP.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)仍然是心血管疾病发病率的一个重要因素。胺碘酮是一种强效抗心律失常药物。本研究调查了口服与静脉注射胺碘酮治疗近期发作(持续时间<48小时)房颤的安全性和有效性。

方法

研究人群包括223例有症状的房颤患者,其中110例接受600毫克口服胺碘酮(A组),分三次给药,113例接受静脉注射胺碘酮(30分钟内给予5毫克/千克,随后在接下来的24小时内给予1000毫克)(B组)。所有之前未接受过地高辛治疗的患者均给予地高辛。所有患者均接受24小时监测。

结果

A组85.45%的患者恢复窦性心律,B组为82.30%(p=无统计学意义)。A组平均复律时间为20±4.5小时,B组为12±8小时(p<0.001)。然而,A组患者在观察期内血压保持稳定,而B组血压显著下降。两组患者均未停药,但B组有13例患者发生浅表静脉炎。

结论

两种给药方式在恢复近期发作房颤的窦性心律方面都非常有效,尽管静脉注射方式起效更快。口服胺碘酮对患者血压无显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验