Pilskalns Ben, Fink Barbara A, Hill Richard M
College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84(4):334-42. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180421748.
The purpose of this study was to assess the corneal response, as measured by corneal oxygen uptake, of keratoconic corneas to SoftPerm and SynergEyes hybrid contact lenses at the central cornea, 2.0 and 4.5 mm temporal to the central cornea, and 1 mm temporal to the limbus.
Corneal oxygen uptake rates were measured with a Clark-type polarographic electrode on the right eyes of 14 subjects and the left eye of 1 subject, all with keratoconus. Measurements were made at the central cornea, 2.0 and 4.5 mm temporal to the central cornea, and 1 mm temporal to the limbus. They were made for the open eye condition, as well as following 300 s of SoftPerm and SynergEyes hybrid contact lens wear. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of measurement location on oxygen uptake rates under uncovered eye conditions. To determine the difference among oxygen uptake rates relative to those of the uncovered eye at each measurement location for each hybrid lens, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used. Multiple comparisons with Tukey-Kramer adjustment were used post hoc to determine which locations were significantly different.
For the uncovered keratoconic cornea, there was no significant difference among the oxygen uptake rates associated with the three corneal locations; however, the oxygen uptake rates measured 1 mm temporal to the limbus were significantly higher than those measured at the three corneal locations. Comparison of oxygen uptake rates measured with the SoftPerm and SynergEyes lenses relative to those of the uncovered eye at each location revealed significantly higher rates at the peripheral cornea than at the central cornea. At all locations, the relative oxygen uptake rates obtained with the SynergEyes lenses were lower than those obtained with the SoftPerm lenses.
The SynergEyes lens allows significantly more oxygen to reach the cornea during wear than the SoftPerm lens at the central cornea, as well as 2.0 mm and 4.5 mm temporal to the central cornea.
本研究旨在通过测量角膜氧摄取量,评估圆锥角膜对SoftPerm和SynergEyes混合型角膜接触镜在中央角膜、中央角膜颞侧2.0和4.5毫米处以及角膜缘颞侧1毫米处的角膜反应。
使用Clark型极谱电极测量了14名受试者右眼和1名受试者左眼的圆锥角膜的角膜氧摄取率。测量部位为中央角膜、中央角膜颞侧2.0和4.5毫米处以及角膜缘颞侧1毫米处。测量在睁眼状态下进行,以及在佩戴SoftPerm和SynergEyes混合型角膜接触镜300秒后进行。采用单向方差分析(ANOVA)来确定测量位置对未覆盖眼睛条件下氧摄取率的影响。为了确定每种混合型镜片在每个测量位置相对于未覆盖眼睛的氧摄取率之间的差异,使用了双向重复测量ANOVA。事后使用Tukey-Kramer调整进行多重比较,以确定哪些位置存在显著差异。
对于未覆盖的圆锥角膜,与三个角膜位置相关的氧摄取率之间没有显著差异;然而,在角膜缘颞侧1毫米处测量的氧摄取率显著高于在三个角膜位置测量的氧摄取率。将SoftPerm和SynergEyes镜片测量的氧摄取率与每个位置未覆盖眼睛的氧摄取率进行比较,发现周边角膜的氧摄取率显著高于中央角膜。在所有位置,SynergEyes镜片获得的相对氧摄取率低于SoftPerm镜片获得的相对氧摄取率。
在佩戴过程中,SynergEyes镜片比SoftPerm镜片能使更多的氧气到达中央角膜以及中央角膜颞侧2.0毫米和4.5毫米处的角膜。