Hoeft Fumiko, Hernandez Arvel, Parthasarathy Sudharshan, Watson Christa L, Hall Scott S, Reiss Allan L
Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research (CIBSR), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Jun;28(6):543-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20406.
Response inhibition is an important facet of executive function. Fragile X syndrome (FraX), with a known genetic etiology (fragile X mental retardation-1 (FMR1) mutation) and deficits in response inhibition, may be an ideal condition for elucidating interactions among gene-brain-behavior relationships. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown evidence of aberrant neural activity when individuals with FraX perform executive function tasks, though the specific nature of this altered activity or possible compensatory processes has yet to be elucidated. To address this question, we examined brain activation patterns using fMRI during a go/nogo task in adolescent males with FraX and in controls. The critical comparison was made between FraX individuals and age, gender, and intelligent quotient (IQ)-matched developmentally delayed controls; in addition to a control group of age and gender-matched typically developing individuals. The FraX group showed reduced activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and right caudate head, and increased contralateral (left) VLPFC activation compared with both control groups. Individuals with FraX, but not controls, showed a significant positive correlation between task performance and activation in the left VLPFC. This potential compensatory activation was predicted by the interaction between FMR1 protein (FMRP) levels and right striatal dysfunction. These results suggest that right fronto-striatal dysfunction is likely an identifiable neuro-phenotypic feature of FraX and that activation of the left VLPFC during successful response inhibition may reflect compensatory processes. We further show that these putative compensatory processes can be predicted by a complex interaction between genetic risk and neural function.
反应抑制是执行功能的一个重要方面。脆性X综合征(FraX)具有已知的遗传病因(脆性X智力低下1(FMR1)突变)且存在反应抑制缺陷,可能是阐明基因-脑-行为关系之间相互作用的理想病症。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究表明,患有FraX的个体在执行执行功能任务时存在异常神经活动的证据,尽管这种改变的活动或可能的代偿过程的具体性质尚未阐明。为了解决这个问题,我们在进行/不进行任务期间,使用fMRI检查了患有FraX的青少年男性和对照组的大脑激活模式。关键的比较是在患有FraX的个体与年龄、性别和智商匹配的发育迟缓对照组之间进行的;此外还有一个年龄和性别匹配的典型发育个体的对照组。与两个对照组相比,FraX组右侧腹外侧前额叶皮质(VLPFC)和右侧尾状核头部的激活减少,而对侧(左侧)VLPFC激活增加。患有FraX的个体而非对照组在左侧VLPFC的激活与任务表现之间存在显著正相关。这种潜在的代偿性激活是由FMR1蛋白(FMRP)水平与右侧纹状体功能障碍之间的相互作用所预测的。这些结果表明,右侧额-纹状体功能障碍可能是FraX可识别的神经表型特征,并且在成功的反应抑制过程中左侧VLPFC的激活可能反映了代偿过程。我们进一步表明,这些假定的代偿过程可以由遗传风险和神经功能之间的复杂相互作用来预测。