Williams Kevin M, Paulhus Delroy L, Hare Robert D
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):205-19. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268074.
A number of self-report psychopathy scales have been used successfully in both clinical and nonclinical settings. However, their factor structure does not adequately capture the four factors (Interpersonal, Affective, Lifestyle, and Antisocial) recently identified in the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) and related measures. This deficit was addressed by upgrading the Self Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP-II; Hare, Hemphill, & Harpur, 1989). In Study 1 (N = 249), an exploratory factor analysis of this experimental version revealed oblique factors similar to those outlined by Hare (2003). In Study 2 (N = 274), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed this structure, that is, four distinct but intercorrelated factors. The factors exhibited appropriate construct validity in a nomological network of related personality measures. Links with self-reports of offensive activities (including entertainment preferences and behavior) also supported the construct validity of the oblique four-factor model.
一些自我报告式心理变态量表已在临床和非临床环境中成功使用。然而，它们的因子结构并不能充分涵盖最近在《心理变态核查表修订版》（PCL-R；黑尔，2003年）及相关测量中确定的四个因子（人际、情感、生活方式和反社会）。通过升级《自我报告心理变态量表》（SRP-II；黑尔、亨普希尔和哈珀，1989年）解决了这一缺陷。在研究1（N = 249）中，对该实验版本进行的探索性因子分析揭示了与黑尔（2003年）概述的那些因子相似的斜交因子。在研究2（N = 274）中，验证性因子分析（CFA）证实了这一结构，即四个不同但相互关联的因子。这些因子在相关人格测量的法理网络中表现出适当的结构效度。与攻击性活动自我报告（包括娱乐偏好和行为）的关联也支持了斜交四因子模型的结构效度。
