Jegger David, Tevaearai Hendrik T, Mallabiabarrena Iker, Horisberger Judith, Seigneul Isabelle, von Segesser Ludwig K
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Artif Organs. 2007 Apr;31(4):290-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00379.x.
Recently, a new oxygenator (Dideco 903 [D903], Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) has been introduced to the perfusion community, and we set about testing its oxygen transfer performance and then comparing it to two other models. This evaluation was based on the comparison between oxygen transfer slope, gas phase arterial oxygen gradients, degree of blood shunting, maximum oxygen transfer, and diffusing capacity calculated for each membrane. Sixty patients were randomized into three groups of oxygenators (Dideco 703 [D703], Dideco; D903; and Quadrox, Jostra Medizintechnik AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) including 40/20 M/F of 68.6 +/- 11.3 years old, with a body weight of 71.5 +/- 12.1 kg, a body surface area (BSA) of 1.84 +/- 0.3 m(2), and a theoretical blood flow rate (index 2.4 times BSA) of 4.4 +/- 0.7 L/min. The maximum oxygen transfer (VO(2)) values were 313 mL O(2)/min (D703), 579 mL O(2)/min (D903), and 400 mL O(2)/min (Quadrox), with the D903 being the most superior (P < 0.05). Oxygen (O(2)) gradients were 320 mm Hg (D703), 235 mm Hg (D903), and 247 mm Hg (Quadrox), meaning D903 and Quadrox are more efficient versus the D703 (P < 0.05). Shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) and diffusing capacity (DmO(2)) were comparable (P = ns). Diffusing capacity values indexed to BSA (DmO(2)/m(2)) were 0.15 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (D703), 0.2 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (D903), and 0.18 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (Quadrox) with D903 outperforming D703 (P < 0.0005). During hypothermia (32.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C), there was a lower absolute and relative VO(2 )for all three oxygenators (P = ns). The O(2) gradients, DmO(2) and DmO(2)/m(2), were significantly lower for all oxygenators (P < 0.01). Also, Qs/Qt significantly rose for all oxygenators (P < 0.01). The oxygen transfer curve is characteristic to each oxygenator type and represents a tool to quantify oxygenator performance. Using this parameter, we demonstrated significant differences among commercially available oxygenators. However, all three oxygenators are considered to meet the oxygen needs of the patients.
最近,一种新型氧合器(迪德科903 [D903],迪德科公司,意大利米兰多拉)已被引入灌注领域,我们开始测试其氧传递性能,然后将其与其他两种型号进行比较。该评估基于对每种膜计算的氧传递斜率、气相动脉氧梯度、血液分流程度、最大氧传递和扩散能力之间的比较。60名患者被随机分为三组使用不同的氧合器(迪德科703 [D703],迪德科公司;D903;以及德国希尔林根约斯特拉医疗技术股份公司的夸德罗斯),其中男性40名、女性20名,年龄68.6±11.3岁,体重71.5±12.1千克,体表面积(BSA)为1.84±0.3平方米,理论血流速率(指数为2.4倍BSA)为4.4±0.7升/分钟。最大氧传递(VO₂)值分别为313毫升O₂/分钟(D703)、579毫升O₂/分钟(D903)和400毫升O₂/分钟(夸德罗斯),D903表现最为出色(P < 0.05)。氧(O₂)梯度分别为320毫米汞柱(D703)、235毫米汞柱(D903)和247毫米汞柱(夸德罗斯),这意味着D903和夸德罗斯相对于D703效率更高(P < 0.05)。分流分数(Qs/Qt)和扩散能力(DmO₂)相当(P = 无显著性差异)。以BSA为指数的扩散能力值(DmO₂/m²)分别为0.15毫升O₂/分钟/毫米汞柱/平方米(D703)、0.2毫升O₂/分钟/毫米汞柱/平方米(D903)和0.18毫升O₂/分钟/毫米汞柱/平方米(夸德罗斯),D903优于D703(P < 0.0005)。在低温(32.0±0.3摄氏度)期间,所有三种氧合器的绝对和相对VO₂均较低(P = 无显著性差异)。所有氧合器的O₂梯度、DmO₂和DmO₂/m²均显著降低(P < 0.01)。此外,所有氧合器的Qs/Qt均显著升高(P < 0.01)。氧传递曲线是每种氧合器类型所特有的,是量化氧合器性能的一种工具。利用这个参数我们证明了市售氧合器之间存在显著差异。然而,所有三种氧合器都被认为能够满足患者的氧需求。