Macholán Milos, Munclinger Pavel, Sugerková Monika, Dufková Petra, Bímová Barbora, Bozíková Eva, Zima Jan, Piálek Jaroslav
Laboratory of Mammalian Evolutionary Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic.
Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):746-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x.
In this paper, we present results of the first comprehensive study of the introgression of both autosomal and sex-chromosome markers across the central European portion of the hybrid zone between two house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. More than 1800 individuals sampled from 105 sites were analyzed with a set of allozyme loci (hopefully representing neutral or nearly neutral markers) and X-linked loci (which are assumed to be under selection). The zone center is best modeled as a single straight line independent of fine-scale local geographic or climatic conditions, being maintained by a balance between dispersal and selection against hybrids. The width (w) of the multilocus autosomal cline was estimated as 9.6 km whereas the estimate for the compound X-chromosome cline was about 4.6 km only. As the former estimate is comparable to that of the Danish portion of the zone (assumed to be much younger than the central European one), zone width does not appear to be related to its age. The strength (B) of the central barrier was estimated as about 20 km; with dispersal (sigma) of about 1 km/gen(1/2), this means effective selection (s*) is approximately 0.06-0.09 for autosomal loci and about 0.25 for X-linked loci. The number of loci under selection was estimated as N= 56-99 for autosomes and about 380 for X-linked loci. Finally, we highlight some potential pitfalls in hybrid zone analyses and in comparisons of different transects. We suggest that conclusions about parts of the mouse genome involved in reproductive isolation and speciation should be drawn with caution and that analytical approaches always providing some estimates should not be used without due care regarding the support or confidence of such estimates, especially if conclusions are based on the difference between these estimates. Finally, we recommend that analysis in two-dimensional space, dense sampling, and rigorous treatment of data, including inspection of likelihood profiles, are essential for hybrid zone studies.
在本文中,我们展示了对两个家鼠亚种,即小家鼠指名亚种(Mus musculus musculus)和小家鼠(M. m. domesticus)杂交区域中欧部分常染色体和性染色体标记渗入情况的首次全面研究结果。从105个地点采集了1800多个个体,用一组等位酶基因座(有望代表中性或近中性标记)和X连锁基因座(假定处于选择作用之下)进行分析。区域中心最好被模拟为一条独立于精细尺度局部地理或气候条件的单一直线,通过杂交种的扩散与选择之间的平衡得以维持。多基因座常染色体渐变群的宽度(w)估计为9.6千米,而复合X染色体渐变群的估计宽度仅约为4.6千米。由于前一个估计值与该区域丹麦部分的估计值相当(假定丹麦部分比中欧部分年轻得多),区域宽度似乎与其年龄无关。中心屏障的强度(B)估计约为20千米;扩散率(sigma)约为1千米/代(1/2),这意味着常染色体基因座的有效选择(s*)约为0.06 - 0.09,X连锁基因座约为0.25。处于选择作用之下的基因座数量估计为常染色体有N = 56 - 99个,X连锁基因座约为380个。最后,我们强调了杂交区域分析和不同样带比较中的一些潜在陷阱。我们建议,关于参与生殖隔离和物种形成的小鼠基因组部分的结论应谨慎得出,并且在没有充分考虑此类估计的支持或可信度的情况下,不应使用总是能提供某些估计值的分析方法,特别是如果结论基于这些估计值之间的差异。最后,我们建议二维空间分析、密集采样以及对数据的严格处理,包括检查似然分布,对于杂交区域研究至关重要。