Liow Lee Hsiang
Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):885-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00077.x.
Lineage persistence is as central to biology as evolutionary change. Important questions regarding persistence include: why do some lineages outlive their relatives, neither becoming extinct nor evolving into separate lineages? Do these long-duration lineages have distinctive ecological or morphological traits that correlate with their geologic durations and potentially aid their survival? In this paper, I test the hypothesis that lineages (species and higher taxa) with longer geologic durations have morphologies that are more average than expected by chance alone. I evaluate this hypothesis for both individual lineages with longer durations and groups of lineages with longer durations, using more than 60 published datasets of animals with adequate fossil records. Analyses presented here show that groups of lineages with longer durations fall empirically into one of three theoretically possible scenarios, namely: (1) the morphology of groups of longer duration lineages is closer to the grand average of their inclusive group, that is, their relative morphological distance is smaller than expected by chance alone, when compared with rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a negative group morpho-duration distribution); (2) the relative morphological distance of groups of longer duration lineages is no different from rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a null group morpho-duration distribution); and (3) the relative morphological distance of groups of longer duration lineages is greater than expected when compared with rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a positive group morpho-duration distribution). Datasets exhibiting negative group morpho-duration distributions predominate. However, lineages with higher ranks in the Linnean hierarchy demonstrate positive morpho-duration distributions more frequently. The relative morphological distance of individual longer duration lineages is no different from that of rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a null individual morpho-duration distribution) for the majority of datasets studied. Contrary to the common idea that very persistent lineages are special or unique in some significant way, both the results from analyses of long-duration lineages as groups and individuals show that they are morphologically average. Persistent lineages often arise early in a group's history, even though there is no prior expectation for this tendency in datasets of extinct groups. The implications of these results for diversification histories and niche preemption are discussed.
谱系持久性与进化变化一样,是生物学的核心内容。关于持久性的重要问题包括:为什么有些谱系比它们的亲属活得更长,既没有灭绝也没有进化成不同的谱系?这些长期存在的谱系是否具有与它们的地质持续时间相关且可能有助于它们生存的独特生态或形态特征?在本文中,我检验了这样一个假设,即地质持续时间较长的谱系(物种和更高分类单元)具有比仅由随机因素预期的更平均的形态。我使用60多个已发表的具有足够化石记录的动物数据集,对持续时间较长的单个谱系和持续时间较长的谱系组进行了这一假设的评估。此处呈现的分析表明,持续时间较长的谱系组根据经验可分为理论上可能的三种情况之一,即:(1)持续时间较长的谱系组的形态更接近其包容性类群的总体平均值,也就是说,与持续时间较短的亲属的稀疏样本相比,它们的相对形态距离比仅由随机因素预期的要小(负的组形态-持续时间分布);(2)持续时间较长的谱系组的相对形态距离与持续时间较短的亲属的稀疏样本没有差异(零组形态-持续时间分布);(3)与持续时间较短的亲属的稀疏样本相比,持续时间较长的谱系组的相对形态距离大于预期(正的组形态-持续时间分布)。呈现负组形态-持续时间分布的数据集占主导。然而,在林奈分类系统中具有较高等级的谱系更频繁地呈现正的形态-持续时间分布。对于大多数研究的数据集,持续时间较长的单个谱系的相对形态距离与持续时间较短的亲属的稀疏样本没有差异(零个体形态-持续时间分布)。与非常持久的谱系在某些重要方面是特殊或独特的这一普遍观点相反,对长期存在的谱系作为组和个体的分析结果都表明它们在形态上是平均的。持久的谱系通常在一个类群历史的早期出现,尽管在已灭绝类群的数据集中对此趋势没有先验预期。本文讨论了这些结果对多样化历史和生态位抢占的影响。