Lidgard Scott, Love Alan C
Integrative Research Center, Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Philosophy and the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Bioscience. 2018 Oct 1;68(10):760-770. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy084. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
Biologists would be mistaken if they relegated living fossils to paleontological inquiry or assumed that the concept is dead. It is now used to describe entities ranging from viruses to higher taxa, despite recent warnings of misleading inferences. Current work on character evolution illustrates how analyzing living fossils and stasis in terms of parts (characters) and wholes (e.g., organisms and lineages) advances our understanding of prolonged stasis at many hierarchical levels. Instead of viewing the concept's task as categorizing living fossils, we show how its primary role is to mark out what is in need of explanation, accounting for the persistence of both molecular and morphological traits. Rethinking different conceptions of living fossils as specific hypotheses reveals novel avenues for research that integrate phylogenetics, ecological and evolutionary modeling, and evo-devo to produce a more unified theoretical outlook.
如果生物学家将活化石归为古生物学研究范畴,或者认为这个概念已经过时,那他们就错了。尽管最近有人警告存在误导性推断,但现在它被用于描述从病毒到高等分类群等各种实体。当前关于性状进化的研究表明,从部分(性状)和整体(如生物体和谱系)的角度分析活化石和停滞现象,如何在许多层次水平上增进我们对长期停滞的理解。我们不是将这个概念的任务视为对活化石进行分类,而是展示其主要作用是指出需要解释的内容,解释分子和形态特征的持久性。将活化石的不同概念重新思考为特定假设,揭示了整合系统发育学、生态和进化建模以及演化发育生物学以产生更统一理论观点的新研究途径。