Stańczyk Maciej, Van Leeuwen Gerard M J, Van Steenhoven Anton A
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Phys Med Biol. 2007 May 7;52(9):2379-91. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/9/004. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
The aim of this paper is to compare two methods of calculating heat transfer in perfused biological tissue using a discrete vessel description. The methods differ in two important aspects: the representation of the vascular system and the algorithm for calculating the heat flux between tissue and blood vessels. The first method was developed at the University of Utrecht between 1994 and 1998 and has been used in several clinical applications. The second method has been proposed by the first author. The methods are briefly described, their assumptions and limitations are discussed. Finally, the test simulation is introduced and the results produced by both methods are compared. The test indicates that the simpler, and less computationally intensive method proposed by the present author for calculating 2D problems containing countercurrent blood vessel systems can reproduce quite well some features of the solution obtained by the more complex 3D method. The observed discrepancies could be explained on physical grounds.
本文旨在比较两种使用离散血管描述来计算灌注生物组织中热传递的方法。这两种方法在两个重要方面存在差异:血管系统的表示以及计算组织与血管之间热通量的算法。第一种方法是1994年至1998年间由乌得勒支大学开发的,已用于多个临床应用中。第二种方法是第一作者提出的。文中简要描述了这两种方法,讨论了它们的假设和局限性。最后,介绍了测试模拟,并比较了两种方法产生的结果。测试表明,作者提出的用于计算包含逆流血管系统的二维问题的更简单、计算量更小方法,能够很好地重现由更复杂的三维方法获得的解的一些特征。观察到的差异可以从物理角度进行解释。