Suppr超能文献

危重症患者从急诊科延迟转入重症监护病房的影响。

Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Chalfin Donald B, Trzeciak Stephen, Likourezos Antonios, Baumann Brigitte M, Dellinger R Phillip

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1477-83. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266585.74905.5A.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Numerous factors can cause delays in transfer to an intensive care unit for critically ill emergency department patients. The impact of delays is unknown. We aimed to determine the association between emergency department "boarding" (holding admitted patients in the emergency department pending intensive care unit transfer) and outcomes for critically ill patients.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional analytical study using the Project IMPACT database (a multicenter U.S. database of intensive care unit patients). Patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (2000-2003) were included and divided into two groups: emergency department boarding >or=6 hrs (delayed) vs. emergency department boarding <6 hrs (nondelayed). Demographics, intensive care unit procedures, length of stay, and mortality were analyzed. Groups were compared using chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and unpaired Student's t-tests.

SETTING

Emergency department and intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (2000-2003).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Main outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital survival and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. During the study period, 50,322 patients were admitted. Both groups (delayed, n = 1,036; nondelayed, n = 49,286) were similar in age, gender, and do-not-resuscitate status, along with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in the subgroup for which it was recorded. Among hospital survivors, the median hospital length of stay was 7.0 (delayed) vs. 6.0 days (nondelayed) (p < .001). Intensive care unit mortality was 10.7% (delayed) vs. 8.4% (nondelayed) (p < .01). In-hospital mortality was 17.4% (delayed) vs. 12.9% (nondelayed) (p < .001). In the stepwise logistic model, delayed admission, advancing age, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, male gender, and diagnostic categories of trauma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and neurologic disease were associated with lower hospital survival (odds ratio for delayed admission, 0.709; 95% confidence interval, 0.561-0.895).

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill emergency department patients with a >or=6-hr delay in intensive care unit transfer had increased hospital length of stay and higher intensive care unit and hospital mortality. This suggests the need to identify factors associated with delayed transfer as well as specific determinants of adverse outcomes.

摘要

目的

众多因素可导致急诊科危重症患者转入重症监护病房的延迟。延迟的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在确定急诊科“滞留”(将已收治患者留在急诊科等待转入重症监护病房)与危重症患者预后之间的关联。

设计

这是一项横断面分析研究,使用了“影响项目”数据库(美国一个重症监护病房患者的多中心数据库)。纳入了从急诊科收治到重症监护病房(2000 - 2003年)的患者,并分为两组:急诊科滞留≥6小时(延迟组)与急诊科滞留<6小时(非延迟组)。分析了人口统计学、重症监护病房诊疗程序、住院时间和死亡率。使用卡方检验、曼 - 惠特尼检验和非配对学生t检验对两组进行比较。

地点

急诊科和重症监护病房。

患者

从急诊科收治到重症监护病房(2000 - 2003年)的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

主要结局为重症监护病房生存率和医院生存率以及重症监护病房住院时间和医院住院时间。在研究期间,共收治了50322例患者。两组(延迟组,n = 1036;非延迟组,n = 49286)在年龄、性别、不进行心肺复苏状态以及记录了急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II(APACHE II)评分的亚组中的APACHE II评分方面相似。在医院存活患者中,中位住院时间延迟组为7.0天,非延迟组为6.0天(p <.001)。重症监护病房死亡率延迟组为10.7%,非延迟组为8.4%(p <.01)。住院死亡率延迟组为17.4%,非延迟组为12.9%(p <.001)。在逐步逻辑回归模型中,延迟入院、年龄增长、较高的APACHE II评分、男性性别以及创伤、脑出血和神经系统疾病的诊断类别与较低的医院生存率相关(延迟入院的比值比为0.709;95%置信区间为0.561 - 0.895)。

结论

重症监护病房转运延迟≥6小时的急诊科危重症患者住院时间延长,重症监护病房死亡率和医院死亡率更高。这表明需要识别与延迟转运相关的因素以及不良结局的具体决定因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验