Mehta Reena, Onatade Raliat, Vlachos Savvas, Maharaj Ritesh
Pharmacy Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jun 26:17511437251350808. doi: 10.1177/17511437251350808.
The English National Health Service (NHS) is a publicly funded system, however significant disparities in provision exist. Whereas the national picture of the distribution of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds has increased over time, less is understood about the regional variation in the rate of growth in ICU services and whether this is related to population growth. The aim of this study was to describe the national variation in the supply of ICU beds in England and evaluate whether there has been a narrowing of the regional disparities in providing ICU beds over time.
Population-based panel analysis of ICU bed supply over a 10-year period, 2012-2021. Data were obtained from publicly available national resources. Descriptive analyses were summarised and trends examined. Disparity gap of ICU beds were calculated for each region. A fixed-effect panel data regression model was used to see the effect of unobserved variables on ICU bed supply for a particular region compared to the country average. Sub-group analysis was done for those 65 years and over.
Overall, ICU beds increased by 9.9%, resulting in a 2.2% increase in ICU beds per 100k population and a decrease by 5.1% in those aged 65 years and over. Between regions, ICU beds per capita varied over time, with a decrease in the South East but an increase in all other regions. In the population aged 65 years and over, the variation of a decrease in ICU beds was more pronounced, with the largest impact in the South East. To increase regional ICU bed capacity to the same as London, which was the region with the highest per capita, for total population, an uplift of 29% to 109% of ICU beds is required and 104% to 246% in those 65 years and over. The unobserved variables have the highest positive impact in ICU bed supply in London and the highest negative impact in the Midlands.
ICU bed supply showed significant regional variations across England. We did not identify any significant narrowing of the regional disparities in provision of ICU beds over time. Further research should focus on better understanding the policy framework that underlies the regional supply of healthcare.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)是一个由公共资金资助的系统,但在医疗服务提供方面存在显著差异。尽管重症监护病房(ICU)床位的全国分布情况随时间有所增加,但对于ICU服务增长率的区域差异以及这是否与人口增长有关,人们了解得较少。本研究的目的是描述英格兰ICU床位供应的全国差异,并评估随着时间的推移,提供ICU床位的区域差距是否有所缩小。
对2012年至2021年这10年间的ICU床位供应进行基于人群的面板分析。数据来自公开可用的国家资源。进行描述性分析并检查趋势。计算每个地区ICU床位的差距。使用固定效应面板数据回归模型来观察未观察到的变量对特定地区ICU床位供应相对于全国平均水平的影响。对65岁及以上人群进行亚组分析。
总体而言,ICU床位增加了9.9%,导致每10万人口的ICU床位增加了2.2%,而65岁及以上人群的ICU床位减少了5.1%。不同地区之间,人均ICU床位随时间变化,东南部有所减少,而其他所有地区均有所增加。在65岁及以上人群中,ICU床位减少的差异更为明显,对东南部的影响最大。要使总人口的区域ICU床位容量与人均最高的伦敦地区相同,需要将ICU床位增加29%至109%,65岁及以上人群则需要增加104%至246%。未观察到的变量对伦敦的ICU床位供应产生的正向影响最大,对中部地区的负向影响最大。
英格兰各地的ICU床位供应存在显著的区域差异。我们没有发现随着时间的推移,提供ICU床位的区域差距有任何显著缩小。进一步的研究应侧重于更好地理解医疗保健区域供应背后的政策框架。