• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管初级保健质量指标。

Quality indicators for cardiovascular primary care.

作者信息

Burge Frederick I, Bower Kelly, Putnam Wayne, Cox Jafna L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2007 Apr;23(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70772-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70772-9
PMID:17440644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2649189/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team was established in 2001 to improve the quality of cardiovascular care for Canadians. Initially, quality indicators (QIs) for hospital-based care for those with acute myocardial infarctions and congestive heart failure were developed and measured. Qualitative research on the acceptability of those indicators concluded that indicators were needed for ambulatory primary care practice, where the bulk of cardiovascular disease care occurs.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically develop QIs for primary care practice for the primary prevention and chronic disease management of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and heart failure.

METHODS

A four-stage modified Delphi approach was used and included a literature review of evidence-based practice guidelines and previously developed QIs; the development and circulation of a survey tool with proposed QIs, asking respondents to rate each indicator for validity, necessity to record and feasibility to collect; an in-person meeting of respondents to resolve rating and content discrepancies, and suggest additional QIs; and recirculation of the survey tool for rating of additional QIs. Participants from across Canada included family physicians, primary care nurses, an emergency room family physician and cardiologists.

RESULTS

31 QIs were agreed on, nine of which were for primary prevention and 22 of which were for chronic disease management.

CONCLUSIONS

A core set of QIs for ambulatory primary care practice has been developed as a tool for practitioners to evaluate the quality of cardiovascular disease care. While the participants rated the indicators as feasible to collect, the next step will be to conduct field validation.

摘要

背景

加拿大心血管结局研究团队于2001年成立,旨在提高加拿大人心血管护理的质量。最初,针对急性心肌梗死和充血性心力衰竭患者的医院护理质量指标(QIs)被制定并进行了测量。关于这些指标可接受性的定性研究得出结论,门诊初级护理实践也需要指标,因为大部分心血管疾病护理都在此进行。

目的

系统地制定用于初级护理实践的质量指标,以用于缺血性心脏病、高血压、高脂血症和心力衰竭的一级预防和慢性病管理。

方法

采用四阶段改良德尔菲法,包括对循证实践指南和先前制定的质量指标进行文献综述;开发并分发包含拟议质量指标的调查工具,要求受访者对每个指标的有效性、记录必要性和收集可行性进行评分;召开受访者面对面会议,以解决评分和内容差异问题,并提出其他质量指标;再次分发调查工具,对其他质量指标进行评分。来自加拿大各地的参与者包括家庭医生、初级护理护士、急诊室家庭医生和心脏病专家。

结果

共商定了31项质量指标,其中9项用于一级预防,22项用于慢性病管理。

结论

已制定了一套门诊初级护理实践的核心质量指标,作为从业者评估心血管疾病护理质量的工具。虽然参与者认为这些指标在收集方面是可行的,但下一步将进行实地验证。

相似文献

1
Quality indicators for cardiovascular primary care.心血管初级保健质量指标。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Apr;23(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70772-9.
2
Quality Indicators of Primary Care Provider Engagement in Nursing Home Care.初级保健提供者参与养老院护理的质量指标。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):824-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.001.
3
Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.高血压质量指标的开发,可从全科医生的电子健康记录中提取:一项随机修正 Delphi 法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 15;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w.
4
Developing quality indicators for Chronic Kidney Disease in primary care, extractable from the Electronic Medical Record. A Rand-modified Delphi method.开发初级保健中慢性肾脏病的质量指标,可从电子病历中提取。一种 Rand 修正 Delphi 方法。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 May 5;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01788-8.
5
Development and Practical Test of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.开发并实践心力衰竭慢性病患者姑息治疗质量指标
Circ J. 2020 Mar 25;84(4):584-591. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0225. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
Development and validation of quality indicators for dementia diagnosis and management in a primary care setting.在基层医疗环境中开发和验证痴呆症诊断和管理的质量指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):557-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02726.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
7
Defining quality indicators for heart failure in general practice.确定基层医疗中心力衰竭的质量指标。
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Aug;74(4):291-298. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1492659. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Development and pilot testing of quality improvement indicators for integrated primary dementia care.制定并试点评估综合性原发性痴呆护理质量改进指标。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000916.
9
Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study.采用改良 Delphi 研究方法制定和共识测试初级保健老年患者药物治疗的质量指标。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):517-538. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01375-x. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
10
Best practices for developing cardiovascular quality indicators.制定心血管质量指标的最佳实践。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Nov;29(11):1516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of Pharmacist Case-Finding and Care Pathway Intervention for Vascular Prevention (PROACT): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.药师血管预防病例发现与护理路径干预(PROACT)的实施:一项随机对照试验方案
CJC Open. 2025 Mar 20;7(6):821-831. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.03.011. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.高血压质量指标的开发,可从全科医生的电子健康记录中提取:一项随机修正 Delphi 法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 15;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w.
3
Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review.合理用药质量指标:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e020437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020437.
4
The Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team performance indicators for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi panel study.门诊护理研究团队心血管疾病一级预防的绩效指标:一项改良德尔菲专家小组研究
CMAJ Open. 2017 Apr 25;5(2):E315-E321. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160139.
5
Hypertension management in rural primary care facilities in Zambia: a mixed methods study.赞比亚农村基层医疗设施中的高血压管理:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 3;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2063-0.
6
Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.针对以患者为中心的质量指标进行识别和分类的范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e013632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013632.
7
Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.反馈差距:以目标设定和行动计划为干预手段,提高初级保健中审核反馈干预效果的实用、整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 17;8:142. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-142.
8
Developing Indicators of Service Quality Provided for CardiovascularPatients Hospitalized in Cardiac Care Unit.制定针对入住心脏监护病房的心血管疾病患者所提供服务质量的指标
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(1):23-8. doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2013.005. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
9
Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review.基于指南的质量指标制定方法——系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-21.
10
Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative.心血管疾病防治指南的协调统一:C-CHANGE倡议
CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1135-50. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101508. Epub 2011 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Can the quality of care in family practice be measured using administrative data?能否使用管理数据来衡量家庭医疗的护理质量?
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2238-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00589.x.
2
Identifying performance indicators for family practice: assessing levels of consensus.确定家庭医疗的绩效指标:评估共识水平。
Can Fam Physician. 2005 May;51(5):700-1.
3
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2.
4
Quality indicators for cardiac care: national standards in a community context.心脏护理质量指标:社区背景下的国家标准
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Jan;11(1):5-12. doi: 10.1258/135581906775094226.
5
Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.人际连续性护理与护理结果:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.285.
6
Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom.将医生薪酬与医疗质量挂钩——英国的一项重大试验。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1448-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr041294.
7
Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK.初级保健的变革会改善健康结果吗?模拟英国为提高医疗质量而引入的经济激励措施的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):191-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.191.
8
What makes a good performance indicator? Devising primary care performance indicators for New Zealand.什么是好的绩效指标?为新西兰设计初级保健绩效指标。
N Z Med J. 2004 Apr 2;117(1191):U820.
9
An overview of the types of physicians treating acute cardiac conditions in Canada.加拿大治疗急性心脏疾病的医生类型概述。
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 1;20(3):282-91.
10
Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems.评估全科医疗中多种疾病的护理质量:实际问题与方法学问题
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):421-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.421.