Suppr超能文献

开发并实践心力衰竭慢性病患者姑息治疗质量指标

Development and Practical Test of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.

Department of Nursing, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.

出版信息

Circ J. 2020 Mar 25;84(4):584-591. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0225. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is highly relevant for patients with heart failure (HF), and there is a need for quantitative information on quality of care. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care of HF patients, and to conduct a practical pilot measurement of the proposed QIs in clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a modified Delphi technique, a consensus method that involves a comprehensive literature review, face-to-face multidisciplinary panel meeting, and anonymous rating in 2 rounds. A 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel individually rated each potential indicator on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) for appropriateness. All indicators receiving a median score ≥7 without significant disagreement were included in the final set of QIs. Through the consensus-building process, 35 QIs were proposed for palliative care in HF patients. Practical measurement in HF patients (n=131) from 3 teaching hospitals revealed that all of the proposed QIs could be obtained retrospectively from medical records, and the following QIs had low performance (<10%): "Intervention by multidisciplinary team", "Opioid therapy for patients with refractory dyspnea", and "Screening for psychological symptoms".

CONCLUSIONS

The first set of QIs for palliative care of HF patients was developed and could clarify quantitative information and might improve the quality of care.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗与心力衰竭(HF)患者高度相关,因此需要有关护理质量的定量信息。因此,本研究旨在为 HF 患者的姑息治疗制定一组质量指标(QIs),并在临床实践中对拟议的 QIs 进行实际的试点测量。

方法和结果

我们使用改良 Delphi 技术,这是一种共识方法,涉及全面的文献回顾、面对面的多学科小组会议以及两轮匿名评分。一个由 15 名多学科专家组成的小组分别对每个潜在指标进行了 1(最低)到 9(最高)的适当性评分。所有获得中位数评分≥7 且没有明显分歧的指标均被纳入最终的 QIs 集。通过共识建立过程,为 HF 患者的姑息治疗提出了 35 个 QIs。来自 3 所教学医院的 131 名 HF 患者的实际测量结果表明,所有拟议的 QIs 都可以从病历中回顾性获得,以下 QIs 的表现不佳(<10%):“多学科团队的干预”、“对难治性呼吸困难患者的阿片类药物治疗”和“心理症状筛查”。

结论

为 HF 患者的姑息治疗制定了第一套 QIs,可以阐明定量信息,并可能提高护理质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验