Erdem O, Erdem M, Erdem A, Memis L, Akyol G
Department of Pathology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):1327-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00942.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
The aim of this study was to compare vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD 34, and endoglin expressions as markers of angiogenesis in proliferative endometrium (PE), endometrial hyperplasia (EH), and endometrial carcinoma (EC) and to find the possible impact of angiogenesis on malign transformation. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 12 patients with PE, 23 patients with simple EH and complex EH with atypia, and 31 patients with EC were included. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to assess the intensity and degree of staining of VEGF. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed with endoglin and anti-CD 34 in most vascular areas. VEGF expression was significantly higher in EC and EH than PE, but there was no difference between EC and EH. According to CD 34 staining, there were no differences in MVD between groups. However, mean MVD counts assessed by endoglin were significantly higher in EC than PE and EH. Although VEGF expression in EC was significantly higher, it did not correlate with other measures of angiogenesis. MVD using endoglin seemed to reflect neoplastic angiogenesis better than CD 34.
本研究旨在比较血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、CD 34和内皮糖蛋白的表达,作为增殖期子宫内膜(PE)、子宫内膜增生(EH)和子宫内膜癌(EC)中血管生成的标志物,并探究血管生成对恶性转化的可能影响。纳入了12例PE患者、23例单纯性EH和非典型复杂性EH患者以及31例EC患者的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织。采用半定量评分系统评估VEGF的染色强度和程度。在大多数血管区域用内皮糖蛋白和抗CD 34评估微血管密度(MVD)。VEGF在EC和EH中的表达显著高于PE,但EC和EH之间无差异。根据CD 34染色,各组间MVD无差异。然而,用内皮糖蛋白评估的平均MVD计数在EC中显著高于PE和EH。虽然EC中VEGF表达显著更高,但它与血管生成的其他指标无相关性。使用内皮糖蛋白的MVD似乎比CD 34能更好地反映肿瘤血管生成。