Suppr超能文献

用于预防蚊虫叮咬和疟疾感染的电子驱蚊器。

Electronic mosquito repellents for preventing mosquito bites and malaria infection.

作者信息

Enayati A A, Hemingway J, Garner P

机构信息

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Medical Entomology, School of Public Health and Environmental Health Research Centre, KM 18 Khazarabad Road, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran, 48175-1553.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD005434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005434.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic mosquito repellents (EMRs) are marketed to prevent mosquitoes biting and to prevent malaria.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether EMRs prevent mosquito bites, and to assess any evidence of an effect on malaria infection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In August 2006, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, and the Science Citation Index. We also checked conference proceedings, contacted international specialist centres and EMR manufacturers, and checked reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Field entomological studies, which controlled for geographic site, time, and attractiveness of human participants, of EMRs for preventing mosquito bites; and randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of EMRs to prevent malaria infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trial quality, and extracted and analysed the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten field entomological studies met the inclusion criteria. All 10 studies found that there was no difference in the number of mosquitoes caught from the bare body parts of the human participants with or without an EMR. No randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of EMR on malaria infection were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Field entomological studies confirm that EMRs have no effect on preventing mosquito bites. Therefore there is no justification for marketing them to prevent malaria infection.

摘要

背景

电子驱蚊器被推向市场以防止蚊虫叮咬并预防疟疾。

目的

评估电子驱蚊器是否能防止蚊虫叮咬,并评估其对疟疾感染影响的相关证据。

检索策略

2006年8月,我们检索了Cochrane传染病小组专业注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库、剑桥科学文摘数据库以及科学引文索引。我们还查阅了会议论文集,联系了国际专业中心和电子驱蚊器制造商,并检查了参考文献列表。

选择标准

针对电子驱蚊器防止蚊虫叮咬的现场昆虫学研究,该研究控制了地理位置、时间以及人类参与者的吸引力;以及电子驱蚊器预防疟疾感染的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者评估了试验质量,并提取和分析了数据。

主要结果

十项现场昆虫学研究符合纳入标准。所有十项研究均发现,在有无电子驱蚊器的情况下,从人类参与者裸露身体部位捕获的蚊子数量没有差异。未发现关于电子驱蚊器预防疟疾感染疗效的随机或半随机对照试验。

作者结论

现场昆虫学研究证实,电子驱蚊器对防止蚊虫叮咬没有效果。因此,将其推向市场以预防疟疾感染是没有道理的。

相似文献

3
Mosquito repellents for malaria prevention.用于预防疟疾的驱蚊剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011595.pub2.
5
House modifications for preventing malaria.住宅改造以预防疟疾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 6;10(10):CD013398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013398.pub4.
6
Mefloquine for preventing malaria in pregnant women.甲氟喹预防孕妇疟疾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 21;3(3):CD011444. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011444.pub2.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

引用本文的文献

9
The impact of Cochrane Reviews.考克兰系统评价的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 7;2011(7):ED000007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000007.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验