• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lapra-Ty夹在聚丙烯和乙交酯缝合线上的体外滑动阻力。

In-vitro gliding resistance of Lapra-Ty clip on polypropylene and glycolide sutures.

作者信息

Orvieto Marcelo A, Lucioni Alvaro, Zorn Kevin C, Mikhail Albert A, Brendler Charles B, Shalhav Arieh L

机构信息

Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):310-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0193.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0193
PMID:17444777
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The LapraTy clip (LTc) is a useful tool for supplementing knot-tying during reconstructive laparoscopic surgery. However, data regarding its safety and efficacy are scarce. We critically assessed the in-vitro performance of the LTc over different sizes of two suture materials commonly used during reconstructive procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The gliding resistance (GR) of one or two LTcs was tested on various sizes of both Polysorb and Prolene sutures. The GR of each suture was then compared with its breaking strength. Forces were measured using a Vernier Force Sensor.

RESULTS

The GR of one LTc was significantly lower than the breaking strength of all Polysorb and Prolene suture sizes with the exception of 7-0 Prolene, with which the suture broke before the LTc slipped off. When two LTcs were placed sequentially, the GR increased significantly compared with a single LTc and was equal to or greater than the breaking strength for Polysorb 3-0 to 5-0 and Prolene 3-0 to 6-0. The percentage of GR over breaking strength was inversely related to suture size and was significantly greater with Prolene than with the Polysorb suture of the same size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide a better understanding of the resistive force an LTc offers before slipping and therefore failing. The results observed with Prolene sutures are encouraging and must be further investigated in an animal study to confirm the safety of the LTc when used during reconstructive procedures.

摘要

背景与目的

LapraTy夹(LTc)是重建性腹腔镜手术中辅助打结的有用工具。然而,关于其安全性和有效性的数据却很少。我们严格评估了LTc在重建手术中常用的两种不同尺寸缝合材料上的体外性能。

材料与方法

在不同尺寸的聚乙醇酸缝线和聚丙烯缝线测试一或两个LTc的滑动阻力(GR)。然后将每种缝线的GR与其断裂强度进行比较。使用游标力传感器测量力。

结果

除7-0聚丙烯缝线外,一个LTc的GR显著低于所有尺寸的聚乙醇酸缝线和聚丙烯缝线的断裂强度,对于7-0聚丙烯缝线,在LTc滑脱之前缝线就已断裂。当依次放置两个LTc时,与单个LTc相比,GR显著增加,并且等于或大于3-0至5-0聚乙醇酸缝线以及3-0至6-0聚丙烯缝线的断裂强度。GR相对于断裂强度的百分比与缝线尺寸呈负相关,并且相同尺寸下聚丙烯缝线的该百分比显著高于聚乙醇酸缝线。

结论

我们的结果能让我们更好地理解LTc在滑脱并因此失效前提供的阻力。在聚丙烯缝线上观察到的结果令人鼓舞,必须在动物研究中进一步研究,以确认LTc在重建手术中使用时的安全性。

相似文献

1
In-vitro gliding resistance of Lapra-Ty clip on polypropylene and glycolide sutures.Lapra-Ty夹在聚丙烯和乙交酯缝合线上的体外滑动阻力。
J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):310-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0193.
2
A comparison of a new polypropylene suture with Prolene.一种新型聚丙烯缝线与普理灵缝线的比较。
J Appl Biomater. 1993 Summer;4(2):169-81. doi: 10.1002/jab.770040209.
3
Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.使用不同缝线类型和尺寸时Lapra-Ty的抓持力和滑脱情况。
Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.061.
4
Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.在张力下,单丝和多丝缝线的扭转会降低缝线强度,并增加缝线断裂的风险。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug;12:168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.机器人手术缝线的拉伸强度和破坏载荷。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3258-3270. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5356-1. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.腹腔镜缝合:器械操作对缝合强度的影响。
J Endourol. 2005 Nov;19(9):1127-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1127.
7
Knot performance of polypropylene sutures.聚丙烯缝线的打结性能。
J Biomed Mater Res. 1996 Fall;33(3):187-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199623)33:3<187::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-M.
8
How reliable is intracorporeal laparoscopic knot tying?体内腹腔镜打结的可靠性如何?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Aug;16(4):428-32. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.428.
9
Comparison of holding strength of suture anchors on human renal capsule.比较缝线锚定器在人肾包膜上的把持力。
J Endourol. 2010 Feb;24(2):293-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0211.
10
Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?机器人辅助血管手术中的缝线损伤:这是个问题吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec;17(6):524-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318150e590.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of different operation techniques and suture materials in pyloric exclusion, in an animal model.
Surg Today. 2008;38(9):826-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-007-3710-6. Epub 2008 Aug 28.