Suppr超能文献

成本核算方法对医院医疗服务单位成本的影响。

Effect of costing methods on unit cost of hospital medical services.

作者信息

Riewpaiboon Arthorn, Malaroje Saranya, Kongsawatt Sukalaya

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Apr;12(4):554-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01815.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the variance of unit costs of hospital medical services due to different costing methods employed in the analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective and descriptive study at Kaengkhoi District Hospital, Saraburi Province, Thailand, in the fiscal year 2002. The process started with a calculation of unit costs of medical services as a base case. After that, the unit costs were re-calculated based on various methods. Finally, the variations of the results obtained from various methods and the base case were computed and compared.

RESULTS

The total annualized capital cost of buildings and capital items calculated by the accounting-based approach (averaging the capital purchase prices throughout their useful life) was 13.02% lower than that calculated by the economic-based approach (combination of depreciation cost and interest on undepreciated portion over the useful life). A change of discount rate from 3% to 6% results in a 4.76% increase of the hospital's total annualized capital cost. When the useful life of durable goods was changed from 5 to 10 years, the total annualized capital cost of the hospital decreased by 17.28% from that of the base case. Regarding alternative criteria of indirect cost allocation, unit cost of medical services changed by a range of -6.99% to +4.05%. We explored the effect on unit cost of medical services in one department. Various costing methods, including departmental allocation methods, ranged between -85% and +32% against those of the base case. Based on the variation analysis, the economic-based approach was suitable for capital cost calculation. For the useful life of capital items, appropriate duration should be studied and standardized. Regarding allocation criteria, single-output criteria might be more efficient than the combined-output and complicated ones. For the departmental allocation methods, micro-costing method was the most suitable method at the time of study.

CONCLUSIONS

These different costing methods should be standardized and developed as guidelines since they could affect implementation of the national health insurance scheme and health financing management.

摘要

目的

探讨分析中采用不同成本核算方法导致的医院医疗服务单位成本差异。

方法

对泰国沙拉武里府康艾区医院2002财年进行回顾性描述性研究。过程始于将医疗服务单位成本计算作为基础案例。之后,根据各种方法重新计算单位成本。最后,计算并比较各种方法与基础案例所得结果的差异。

结果

采用基于会计的方法(在其使用寿命内平均资本购置价格)计算的建筑物和资本项目年度化总成本,比采用基于经济的方法(使用寿命内折旧成本与未折旧部分利息的组合)计算的结果低13.02%。贴现率从3%变为6%会导致医院年度化总成本增加4.76%。当耐用品使用寿命从5年变为10年时,医院年度化总成本较基础案例降低了17.28%。关于间接成本分配的替代标准,医疗服务单位成本变化范围为-6.99%至+4.05%。我们探讨了对一个科室医疗服务单位成本的影响。各种成本核算方法,包括科室分配方法,与基础案例相比在-85%至+32%之间。基于差异分析,基于经济的方法适用于资本成本计算。对于资本项目的使用寿命,应研究并规范适当的期限。关于分配标准,单产出标准可能比组合产出和复杂标准更有效。对于科室分配方法,微观成本核算方法是研究时最合适的方法。

结论

这些不同的成本核算方法应进行规范并制定为指南,因为它们可能会影响国家健康保险计划的实施和卫生筹资管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验