Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病和路易体痴呆中生物类别缺陷占主导。

A predominance of category deficits for living things in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia.

作者信息

Laws Keith R, Crawford John R, Gnoato Francesca, Sartori Giuseppe

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 May;13(3):401-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070610.

Abstract

Although semantic memory impairment is well documented in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type, questions remain as to whether the deficit extends to other forms of dementia and whether it differentially affects different domains of knowledge. We examined category naming on two tasks (picture naming and naming-to-description) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD: n = 11), Lewy body dementia (DLB: n = 11) and healthy elderly matched controls (n = 22). The DLB and AD groups showed significantly worse naming on both tasks, although the AD patients were more impaired than the DLB patients. Like some AD patients, some DLB patients showed evidence of category-specific naming deficits, and strikingly, all 25 significant category dissociations were for living things. The latter finding accords with the preponderance of living deficits previously documented for AD patients, but extends this finding to DLB patients. The implications of this category bias is discussed in relation to relevant models of category specificity.

摘要

尽管阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者的语义记忆损害已有充分记录,但对于这种缺陷是否扩展到其他形式的痴呆以及它是否对不同知识领域有不同影响仍存在疑问。我们在阿尔茨海默病(AD:n = 11)、路易体痴呆(DLB:n = 11)患者以及健康老年匹配对照组(n = 22)中,对两项任务(图片命名和描述性命名)的类别命名进行了检查。DLB组和AD组在两项任务中的命名表现均显著更差,尽管AD患者比DLB患者受损更严重。与一些AD患者一样,一些DLB患者也表现出类别特异性命名缺陷的证据,而且引人注目的是,所有25个显著的类别分离都针对生物。后一发现与先前记录的AD患者中生物缺陷占优势的情况相符,但将这一发现扩展到了DLB患者。本文结合类别特异性的相关模型讨论了这种类别偏向的意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验