Tsai Max, Lu Ze, Wang Jie, Yeh Teng-Kuang, Wientjes M Guillaume, Au Jessie L-S
College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Pharm Res. 2007 Sep;24(9):1691-701. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9298-0. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
The rationale for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is to expose peritoneal tumors to high drug concentrations. While multiple phase III trials have established the significant survival advantage by adding IP therapy to intravenous therapy in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients, the use of IP chemotherapy is limited by the complications associated with indwelling catheters and by the local chemotherapy-related toxicity. The present study evaluated the effects of drug carrier on the disposition and efficacy of IP paclitaxel, for identifying strategies for further development of IP treatment.
Three paclitaxel formulations, i.e., Cremophor micelles, Cremophor-free paclitaxel-loaded gelatin nanoparticles and polymeric microparticles, were evaluated for peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity in mice after IP injection. Whole body autoradiography and scanning electron microscopy were used to visualize the spatial drug distribution in tissues. A kinetic model, depicting the multiple processes involved in the peritoneal-to-plasma transfer of paclitaxel and its carriers, was established to determine the mechanisms by which a drug carrier alters the peritoneal targeting advantage.
Autoradiographic results indicated that IP injection yielded much higher paclitaxel concentrations in intestinal tissues relative to intravenous injection. Compared to the Cremophor and nanoparticle formulations, the microparticles showed slower drug clearance from the peritoneal cavity, slower absorption into the systemic circulation, longer residence time, 10- to 45-times greater peritoneal targeting advantage and approximately 2-times longer increase in survival time (p < 0.01 for all parameters).
Our results indicate the important roles of drug carrier in determining the peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity of IP treatment.
腹腔内(IP)化疗的基本原理是使腹腔肿瘤暴露于高药物浓度下。虽然多项III期试验已证实,在最佳减瘤的卵巢癌患者中,将IP治疗添加到静脉治疗可带来显著的生存优势,但IP化疗的应用受到与留置导管相关的并发症以及局部化疗相关毒性的限制。本研究评估了药物载体对IP紫杉醇处置和疗效的影响,以确定IP治疗进一步发展的策略。
评估了三种紫杉醇制剂,即聚氧乙烯蓖麻油胶束、无聚氧乙烯蓖麻油的载紫杉醇明胶纳米颗粒和聚合物微粒,在IP注射后对小鼠的腹腔靶向优势和抗肿瘤活性。采用全身放射自显影和扫描电子显微镜观察组织中的药物空间分布。建立了一个动力学模型,描述紫杉醇及其载体从腹腔到血浆转移过程中涉及的多个过程,以确定药物载体改变腹腔靶向优势的机制。
放射自显影结果表明,与静脉注射相比,IP注射后肠道组织中的紫杉醇浓度要高得多。与聚氧乙烯蓖麻油和纳米颗粒制剂相比,微粒从腹腔清除药物的速度较慢,吸收进入体循环的速度较慢,停留时间较长,腹腔靶向优势高10至45倍,生存时间延长约2倍(所有参数p<0.01)。
我们的结果表明药物载体在确定IP治疗的腹腔靶向优势和抗肿瘤活性方面起着重要作用。