Bond G G, Flores G H, Stafford B A, Olsen G W
Dow Chemical Company, Health and Environmental Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, Midland, MI 48674.
J Occup Med. 1991 Sep;33(9):958-61.
There are few epidemiologic data available to address the question of potential carcinogenic effects of hydrogen chloride (HCl) exposure on humans. An opportunity arose to augment a nominal HCl exposure classification that had been done earlier for a nested case-control study of lung cancer among a cohort of chemical manufacturing employees. Working from first-hand knowledge of the relevant chemical processes and limited HCl monitoring data, a certified industrial hygienist estimated average exposures for each of the job assignments of 308 lung cancer cases and 616 comparison workers. The risk of lung cancer was then analyzed in relation to several measures of HCl exposure, including duration, a cumulative exposure score, highest average exposure, and latency. None showed evidence of an association between HCl exposure and lung cancer. This is consistent with the limited rodent bioassay data, which also failed to find a tumorigenic response from HCl. Thus, even at high level occupational exposures (up to 3000 micrograms/m3 for several years) there is no evidence that HCl is a human carcinogen.
关于氯化氢(HCl)暴露对人类潜在致癌作用的问题,现有的流行病学数据很少。之前针对一组化工制造业员工进行了肺癌巢式病例对照研究,已完成了对HCl暴露的名义分类,在此基础上出现了一个增加相关内容的机会。一位注册工业卫生学家根据对相关化学过程的第一手了解以及有限的HCl监测数据,估算了308例肺癌病例和616名对照工人各自工作岗位的平均暴露量。随后分析了肺癌风险与HCl暴露的几种测量指标之间的关系,这些指标包括暴露持续时间、累积暴露分数、最高平均暴露量和潜伏期。没有一项指标显示出HCl暴露与肺癌之间存在关联。这与有限的啮齿动物生物测定数据一致,该数据也未发现HCl有致癌反应。因此,即使在高水平职业暴露(数年中最高达3000微克/立方米)的情况下,也没有证据表明HCl是人类致癌物。