• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由急诊科高级医务人员在非工作时间解读非增强头部CT扫描结果。

Out of hours non-contrast head CT scan interpretation by senior emergency department medical staff.

作者信息

Khoo Nee Chen, Duffy Martin

机构信息

University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Apr;19(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00914.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00914.x
PMID:17448097
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of 'out of hours' (17.00-08.00 hours) non-contrast head computed tomography (NCHCT) scan interpretation by senior ED medical staff.

METHODS

The study was undertaken in an inner-city tertiary hospital in Sydney. A sample of 315 consecutive 'out of hours' NCHCT scans was compiled from a log book in the Medical Imaging Department and randomized into 21 sets of 15 scans. The scans were reviewed by emergency physicians and registrars recruited for the study and their interpretations were compared with the formal radiologist report.

RESULTS

Seven emergency physicians and 14 registrars took part in the study. Two hundred and eighty-seven ED interpretations were used in the 2 x 2 table analysis. The overall observed agreement was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.72), sensitivity 0.57 (95% CI 0.45-0.69), specificity 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76) and kappa 0.24 (95% CI 0.13-0.36). There were 32 false negative interpretations including three small contre coup contusions and three subdural haemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

'Out of hours' NCHCT scan interpretation by senior ED medical staff is only correct two-thirds of the time. Further education for all senior ED staff is indicated to improve our accuracy. The safety of NCHCT scan interpretation by senior ED medical staff needs further study.

摘要

目的

评估急诊科高级医务人员对非工作时间(17:00 - 08:00)非增强头部计算机断层扫描(NCHCT)的解读准确性。

方法

该研究在悉尼市中心的一家三级医院进行。从医学影像科的日志中收集了315例连续的非工作时间NCHCT扫描样本,并随机分为21组,每组15次扫描。由为该研究招募的急诊医师和住院医师对扫描进行评估,并将他们的解读与放射科医生的正式报告进行比较。

结果

7名急诊医师和14名住院医师参与了该研究。在2×2表格分析中使用了287份急诊科的解读。总体观察一致性为0.67(95%置信区间[CI] 0.61 - 0.72),敏感性为0.57(95% CI 0.45 - 0.69),特异性为0.70(95% CI 0.64 - 0.76),kappa值为0.24(95% CI 0.13 - 0.36)。有32例假阴性解读,包括3例小的对冲性脑挫伤和3例硬膜下出血。

结论

急诊科高级医务人员对非工作时间NCHCT扫描的解读只有三分之二是正确的。建议对所有急诊科高级工作人员进行进一步培训以提高准确性。急诊科高级医务人员对NCHCT扫描解读的安全性需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Out of hours non-contrast head CT scan interpretation by senior emergency department medical staff.由急诊科高级医务人员在非工作时间解读非增强头部CT扫描结果。
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Apr;19(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00914.x.
2
Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department.创伤中的头颅计算机断层扫描:急诊科工作人员的解读准确性
Emerg Med J. 2005 Aug;22(8):538-40. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.013755.
3
Emergency head CT scans: can neurosurgical registrars be relied upon to interpret them?急诊头颅CT扫描:神经外科住院医师对其解读结果可靠吗?
Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Apr;23(2):158-61. doi: 10.1080/02688690902730723.
4
'Out of hours' adult CT head interpretation by senior emergency department staff following an intensive teaching session: a prospective blinded pilot study of 405 patients.'非工作时间'高级急诊科工作人员在强化教学后对成人 CT 头部进行解读:一项针对 405 名患者的前瞻性盲法试点研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jun;31(6):467-70. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202005. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
5
Interpretation of head CT scans in the emergency department by fellows versus general staff non-neuroradiologists: a closer look at the effectiveness of a quality control program.住院医师与非神经放射科普通 staff 在急诊科解读头部 CT 扫描结果的比较:深入探讨质量控制计划的有效性。 (注:这里“staff”结合语境推测可能是指“医务人员”,原英文表述稍显不严谨)
Emerg Radiol. 2007 Oct;14(5):311-6. doi: 10.1007/s10140-007-0645-6. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
6
Evaluation of emergency CT scans of the head: is there a community standard?头部急诊CT扫描评估:是否存在社区标准?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1727-30. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801727.
7
Can middle grade and consultant emergency physicians accurately interpret computed tomography scans performed for head trauma? Cross-sectional study.中级和会诊急诊医师能否准确解读因头部创伤而进行的计算机断层扫描?横断面研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Aug;26(8):583-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.067074.
8
Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists.头部创伤:放射科住院医师与放射科 staff 对CT扫描结果的解读
Radiology. 1998 Jul;208(1):125-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646802.
9
Head computed tomography in the emergency department: a collection of easily missed findings that are life-threatening or life-changing.急诊科的头部计算机断层扫描:一系列易被漏诊的、危及生命或改变人生的发现。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):646-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.042. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
10
Are emergency physicians competent to interpret the cranial CT of patients younger than the age of 2 years with mild head trauma?急诊医生有能力解读2岁以下轻度头部外伤患者的头颅CT吗?
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1175-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Brain Computed Tomography Diagnosis by Emergency Medicine Physicians.急诊医师行脑计算机断层诊断的准确性。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 26;2022:5659129. doi: 10.1155/2022/5659129. eCollection 2022.
2
Rethinking Radiology: An Active Learning Curriculum for Head Computed Tomography Interpretation.重新思考放射学:头部计算机断层扫描解读的主动学习课程。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):47-51. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53665.
3
Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: Data Standards and Statistical Considerations.
创伤性脑损伤的生物标志物:数据标准和统计考虑。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 15;38(18):2514-2529. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6762. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Accuracy of Non-Contrast CT Brain Interpretation by Emergency Physicians: A cohort study.急诊医师对非增强 CT 脑解读的准确性:一项队列研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Apr;29(2):549-53. doi: 10.12669/pjms.292.3220.