Klein Thomas, Magerl Walter, Hanschmann Angelika, Althaus Michael, Treede Rolf-Detlef
Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Saarstr. 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany.
Eur J Pain. 2008 Jan;12(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
NMDA-receptors are a major target in the prevention and treatment of hyperalgesic pain states in neuropathic pain. However, previous studies revealed equivocal results depending on study design and efficacy parameters. We tested the analgesic (generalized reduction of generation and processing of nociceptive signalling) and anti-hyperalgesic (prevention of central sensitization) properties of the NMDA-receptor antagonist neramexane and the potassium channel opener flupirtine in the intradermal capsaicin injection model. Furthermore, we tested the effect on pain summation (wind up). Eighteen healthy subjects received either a single dose of neramexane (40 mg p.o.), flupirtine (100 mg) or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Pain evoked by intradermal capsaicin injection as well as pain evoked by pinpricks was significantly reduced by neramexane (-22% to -30% vs. placebo) in the non-sensitized skin indicating a marked analgesic effect. Moreover, dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain to light touch) was also significantly attenuated by neramexane (-28% vs. placebo). However, static secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick stimuli after capsaicin injection was not significantly reduced (-9% vs. placebo). Flupirtine showed no analgesic or anti-hyperalgesic effect. Mechanically-evoked wind up of pain sensation was not affected by any treatment. The results suggests that in a human surrogate model of neurogenic hyperalgesia a single low-dose of neramexane had a marked analgesic effect in the sensitized and in the non-sensitized state and thus may be a useful drug to treat the enhanced pain sensitivity in neuropathic pain patients. Its efficacy may be based on analgesia rather than anti-hyperalgesia or anti-windup. In contrast, flupirtine showed neither an analgesic nor an anti-hyperalgesic effect at a dose used for the treatment of postoperative pain.
N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体是预防和治疗神经性疼痛中痛觉过敏疼痛状态的主要靶点。然而,以往的研究根据研究设计和疗效参数显示出了模棱两可的结果。我们在皮内注射辣椒素模型中测试了NMDA受体拮抗剂奈拉西坦和钾通道开放剂氟吡汀的镇痛作用(普遍减少伤害性信号的产生和处理)和抗痛觉过敏作用(预防中枢敏化)。此外,我们还测试了其对疼痛总和(wind up)的影响。在一项双盲、随机、交叉研究中,18名健康受试者分别接受单剂量的奈拉西坦(口服40毫克)、氟吡汀(100毫克)或安慰剂。在未致敏皮肤中,奈拉西坦可显著减轻皮内注射辣椒素诱发的疼痛以及针刺诱发的疼痛(与安慰剂相比降低了22%至30%),表明其具有显著的镇痛作用。此外,奈拉西坦还可显著减轻动态机械性异常性疼痛(轻触疼痛)(与安慰剂相比降低了28%)。然而,辣椒素注射后对针刺刺激的静态继发性痛觉过敏并未显著减轻(与安慰剂相比降低了9%)。氟吡汀未显示出镇痛或抗痛觉过敏作用。机械诱发的疼痛感觉总和不受任何治疗的影响。结果表明,在神经源性痛觉过敏的人体替代模型中,单剂量低剂量的奈拉西坦在致敏和未致敏状态下均具有显著的镇痛作用,因此可能是治疗神经性疼痛患者疼痛敏感性增强的有用药物。其疗效可能基于镇痛作用而非抗痛觉过敏或抗疼痛总和作用。相比之下氟吡汀在用于治疗术后疼痛的剂量下既未显示出镇痛作用也未显示出抗痛觉过敏作用。